The Same Batman Card Exists in Four Countries and Only the Back Tells You Which
Copyright A&BC, printed in England
Turn a 1966 Batman card over and read the small print at the bottom. That single line is the difference between three separate collectibles that look identical from the front, and this index tracks all three.
The reason four countries got four versions is licensing, and the reason it matters to you is that they do not grade alike.
Who printed what
Topps printed the American issue, and put out five separate series in a single year.
O-Pee-Chee printed Canada.
A&BC Gum printed England, and was a sister company of Topps rather than a competitor.
Scanlens Sweets printed Australia. There was a Netherlands issue as well.
This index tracks the first three. Scanlens material reaches the English-language market rarely enough that a price index would be guessing.
The identification method
Every one of them used the same Norman Saunders paintings on the front. There is no reliable way to separate them by looking at the picture.
The back is where it is settled, and the wording is specific.
Topps: orange back on the Black Bat series.
O-Pee-Chee: also an orange back, reading Copyright T.G.C PRTD in Canada. Otherwise effectively identical to the Topps card, which is why so many are mislisted.
A&BC: a pink back rather than orange, reading Copyright A&BC PTD in England.
A&BC Fan Club: pink again, but reading Printed in Great Britain rather than England, with an extra panel advertising the Batman Fan Club.
Scanlens: noticeably darker stock.
So on the Black Bat series the colour of the back does most of the work: orange is North American, pink is British. Distinguishing Topps from O-Pee-Chee needs the copyright line itself.
And A&BC's are smaller
The English cards are physically smaller than their American equivalents, which is the one difference you can see without turning the card over if you have two side by side.
We have written about why A&BC printed America's cards smaller and what that did to their grades, so we will not repeat it here. The short version is that British confectionery packaging conventions were not American ones, and the cards were sized to the packet rather than the other way round.
What this does to condition
Here is where the distinction stops being trivia.
Across the classes this index tracks, the three printings do not average the same grade, and the order surprises people. The full comparison is in the A&BC article, where we had to correct our own premise after running the numbers.
Beyond the printer, the whole 1966 Batman issue has two problems that apply everywhere.
The finish is flat and the stock is thin. Collectors who have handled large quantities describe both as having aged badly, which is consistent with a set where one of the series has never produced a PSA 10 at all.
And the centering is frequently poor. Cards that are otherwise clean are commonly off-centre, which caps the grade before any handling damage is considered. That is the same mechanism we found in the sheet arithmetic behind these sets: a 55-card series does not divide evenly into a 132-card block, and the cutting was not the careful part of the process.
Why four printers existed at all
It was not a quality decision. It was how licensing worked in 1966.
Shipping printed cardboard across an ocean cost more than licensing a local company to print it, and every market had its own confectionery distribution, its own pack sizes and its own price points. Topps licensed the property and let each territory produce its own.
The result is that the same painting was separated onto four different presses, on four different paper stocks, cut by four different machines.
Which is exactly the situation we found with the 1977 Star Wars cards, where the Canadian O-Pee-Chee printing is worth more than the American Topps despite carrying the same photograph. Same arrangement, same decade, opposite outcome.
What to check before you buy
Three things.
Insist on a photograph of the back. On this issue a front-only listing is not enough information to know what is being sold. Sellers mislabel O-Pee-Chee as Topps constantly, and usually without meaning to.
Read the copyright line, not the colour alone. Orange narrows it to North America and nothing more.
And check which A&BC printing it is. Printed in England and Printed in Great Britain are different issues, and the Fan Club panel is the visible tell.
The thing worth sitting with
Norman Saunders painted one set of pictures. A television show that ABC expected to be an embarrassment turned them into a phenomenon, and four countries printed them within months of each other.
Sixty years later the fronts are still indistinguishable and the backs still are not, and a line of copyright text six point high decides what a card is worth.
This index tracks every 1966 Batman series across Topps, O-Pee-Chee and A&BC, card by card and grade by grade. You can read how we work the numbers out.
Sources
Checked on 18 September 2026.
- O-Pee-Chee printing Canada with backs reading Copyright T.G.C PRTD in Canada; A&BC printing England with pink backs reading Copyright A&BC PTD in England; the separate A&BC Fan Club printing reading Printed in Great Britain with an added fan club panel; and Scanlens printing Australia on slightly darker stock — BatmanCards.com's series-by-series photographic guides
- Sets also produced in the Netherlands and Australia, A&BC's cards being smaller than their Topps equivalents, and A&BC being a sister company of Topps — PSA's article on the 1966 Topps Batman sets and collector discussion on the 66batman.com forums
- The flat finish and thin stock ageing badly, and off-centre artwork being common on otherwise mint cards — Cardboard Connection's guide to the 1966 Batman cards
- Grade averages across the three printings — this index, as reported in our A&BC article