1966 A&BC Batman Bat Laffs #55 — Raw

Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $4.20 | Auction | pending | — | 1966 Batman A&BC Printed in England - BAT LAFFS - Card Number 55 |
![]() | $2.00 | Buy It Now | pending | — | Batman 1966 Bat Laffs A&BC: Card #55 v2 The Penguin British Version |
![]() | $4.00 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | Batman 1966 Bat Laffs A&BC: Card #55 v1 The Penguin British Version |
![]() | $15.59 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–6) | — | Batman Bat Laffs A&BC Trading Card #55 The Penguin - 1966 UK Print. |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (approx 70/30 left-heavy), top border slightly wider than bottom (approx 60/40), placing this in poor centering territory but not an obvious miscut — no adjacent card printing visible on any edge. Corners show visible rounding on all four, most pronounced at bottom-right and top-right, consistent with a VG range card. Surface shows general gloss loss and what appears to be light soiling or toning across the image area; no obvious hard crease is visible from this photo but the image resolution limits certainty. Edges appear reasonably intact with typical A&BC rough-cut characteristics, not penalized heavily, but overall wear pattern and corner rounding point to a PSA 3 VG as most likely, with range spanning 2-4 depending on any reverse creases or staining not visible here.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (roughly 70/30 left-right), top border slightly narrower than bottom (roughly 60/40 top-bottom), indicating moderate off-center condition. The heavy posterization/color processing applied to this image severely limits assessment of surface gloss, print defects, and fine corner wear — this is the primary driver of wide range and low confidence. Corners appear somewhat soft/rounded under the processing, suggesting at minimum light wear consistent with VG-EX to EX range, but creasing cannot be ruled out. No obvious tears, writing, or major damage are visible, but the artificial image treatment makes it impossible to confirm gloss retention or detect light creases; the range of 3–6 reflects this genuine uncertainty.

