1966 A&BC Batman Black Bat #34 — Raw

Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $4.28 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 A&BC Batman Black Bat Batman Deadly Claws #34 04le |
![]() | $5.49 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 A&BC Batman Black Bat Batman Deadly Claws #34 0a4f |
![]() | $6.00 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 A&BC Batman Black Bat Batman Deadly Claws #34 0o8j |
![]() | $6.52 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 A&BC Batman Black Bat Batman Deadly Claws #34 0a6 |
![]() | $6.58 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 A&BC Batman Black Bat Batman Deadly Claws #34 04le |
![]() | $11.18 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 A&BC Batman Black Bat Batman Deadly Claws #34 11bd |
![]() | $11.18 | Buy It Now | slabbed? | — | 1966 A&BC Batman Black Bat Batman Deadly Claws #34 11bd |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (roughly 70/30 left-heavy), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 60/40), so centering is off but not catastrophically miscut. Corners show visible rounding on all four, most notably the lower-left corner which appears soft and worn - consistent with a VG card. The card surface shows moderate gloss loss and what appears to be some light soiling or toning in the lower-left area; the Comet watermark obscures a significant portion of the surface making a definitive surface grade impossible. Edges appear reasonably intact without major chips, but the overall wear pattern and rounded corners point to a VG (3) grade, with VG-EX (4) possible if the hidden surface areas are cleaner than they appear, and GOOD (2) possible if the lower-left shows a crease not visible here.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right border (approximately 70/30 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 60/40 T/B) - centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show visible rounding on all four corners visible in this view, consistent with a VG-range card. Surface shows significant wear with what appears to be gloss loss and possible light soiling or staining, particularly noticeable in the white/light areas of the card. Edges appear rough but this is normal for A&BC cuts of this era and should not be over-penalized; the back is not visible so creases cannot be fully ruled out, widening the range downward. Overall condition reads solidly VG (3) with a chance of VG-EX (4) if surface wear is less severe than it appears, or GOOD (2) if hidden creases are present on the reverse.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably thinner than right (roughly 70/30 left-to-right), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 55/45 — centering is off horizontally and will be penalized. Corners visible on the upper-left and lower-left appear to show some rounding or soft wear; right-side corners are partially obscured by glare but suggest light wear. Surface shows reasonable gloss retention with no obvious creases visible from this view, and color saturation looks solid with no major print defects noted. The back is not visible, and corner detail is partially limited by the soft holder glare, so the range is widened accordingly; a crease on the reverse or heavier corner wear than visible here could push this toward a 4.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 60/40 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 55/45 T/B) - centering is off but not severely so. Corners show visible rounding on at least the lower-left and lower-right corners visible in the scan, suggesting meaningful wear consistent with VG-EX to EX range. Surface shows some toning/aging consistent with a 57-year-old British card, and there is moderate gloss loss across the face. No obvious creases are detectable from this photo but the COM-C watermark obscures the center surface, preventing confident crease assessment. Edges appear slightly rough but that is normal for A&BC cut quality. The card grades most likely as VG-EX (4), with EX (5) possible if corners are better than they appear and no hidden creases exist, and VG (3) possible if the obscured center conceals a crease.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 60/40 T/B) - off-center but not severely miscut. Corners show visible rounding on at least the upper-left and lower-left, consistent with VG to VG-EX range; right-side corners are harder to assess due to perspective. Surface shows some gloss loss and what appears to be light toning/age wear consistent with a 55+ year old British card; no obvious creases are visible but the CoMC watermark obscures the center surface entirely, making crease detection unreliable. Edges appear reasonably clean for an A&BC issue where rough cuts are expected; the small nick/tear visible at upper-right corner is a meaningful flaw that pulls the ceiling down. The combination of corner rounding, off-centering, and the unverifiable center surface warrants a wide range with honest uncertainty.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (~60-65% left bias), top border slightly wider than bottom, roughly 65/35 L/R and 60/40 T/B - centering is off but not catastrophically miscut. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners visible from this angle (top-left and bottom-left appear blunted), suggesting VG to VG-EX range. Surface shows significant toning/yellowing of the card stock consistent with age, with noticeable gloss loss across the face; the card has a distinctly worn, aged appearance. The COM.CT watermark obscures potential surface creases in the lower-center area, preventing confident assessment of crease presence - if a crease exists there the grade would fall to a firm 2, but absent confirmed crease the VG (3) estimate is most likely given the corner rounding, toning, and gloss loss observed.
Same card, other grades
Raw (2)
