1966 A&BC Batman Riddler Back #20
1966 A&BC Batman Riddler Back #20 — Raw
Buy it now on eBay $6.58 ›cheapest of 1 live listing on eBay
Edit note
Saving an empty note removes it. The page rebuilds
within five minutes.
1live listings
0confirmed sales
This card in every grade
What the same card is asking in the other holders this index tracks.
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 1 | $6.58 | — |
| PSA 7 | — | — | — |
Asking range
Not enough history yet. The index needs 2 listings priced at the same time across 3 intervals before it will draw a range - one seller’s asking price is an anecdote, not a market.
Confirmed sales
No confirmed sales recorded yet. The index logs a sale only after a listing verifiably ends — auction results at the final bid. As tracked auctions close, comps appear here automatically.
1 listed · 1 seller30-day window
Live listings
Asking prices and current bids — not values. Est. grade is our opinion from the seller’s photo, on the PSA scale — see notes below.
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $6.58 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 A&BC Batman Riddler Back Batman Adam West Attacked #20 04le on eBay |
Index grading notes
Estimated grades are this site’s opinion, derived from the seller’s photo and expressed on the PSA scale. Not affiliated with or endorsed by PSA; not a guarantee of any grading outcome.
Estimated grade: 3 (2–4) · LOW confidence · asking $6.58
Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 70/30 L-R favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 60/40 T-B) — off-center but not dramatically miscut. The COMC watermark obscures the lower-centre surface making surface assessment difficult. Corners show visible rounding at all four corners, consistent with a VG (3) range card; no sharp points are discernible. There appears to be some general gloss loss and toning across the image area typical of aged A&BC stock, and the edges show some roughness consistent with the period cut. No obvious hard crease is visible from this single photo, but the low image quality and watermark obstruction prevent ruling one out, hence the wide range of 2–4.