Advertising disclosure: NonSportCardIndex is a participant in the eBay Partner Network. Links to eBay on this site are advertising, and as an eBay Partner Network affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Nonsport Card IndexNSCI-0020597 · GRADED OPINIONS ON EVERY RAW CARD
20,597 live listings tracked10,121 card classes11,384 confirmed salesupdated 24 min ago
1966 Batman

1966 OPC Batman Bat Laffs #37 Aunt Harriet

1966 OPC Batman Bat Laffs #37 Aunt Harriet
Buy it now on eBay $2.50 ›cheapest of 6 live listings on eBay
6live listings
3confirmed sales
6grades tracked

Every grade of this card

Raw and graded copies tracked side by side. Prices are asking prices and current bids; comps are confirmed sales.
GradeLiveAsking rangeLast confirmed saleEst. grade (ours)
Raw4$2.50 – $10.89$1.00 2026-11-044.0
TAG ?0———
PSA 71$100.00——
PSA 80—$105.06 2026-09-30—
PSA 90———
BVG 9.51$1,400.00——

Confirmed sales — all grades

DateGradePriceConfidence
2026-11-04Raw$1.00HIGH
2026-11-04Raw$1.00HIGH
2026-09-30PSA 8$105.06HIGH

Index grading notes

Estimated grades are this site’s opinion, derived from the seller’s photo and expressed on the PSA scale. Not affiliated with or endorsed by PSA; not a guarantee of any grading outcome.
1966 O-Pee-Chee Batman Bat Laffs Aunt Harriet #37 0o5t
Estimated grade: 4 (3–5) · MEDIUM confidence · asking $10.89

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears moderately wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable but not tight. The CoMC watermark obscures the center surface, making a full surface read impossible. Corners appear to show some rounding — the visible upper-left and upper-right corners show softening consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Edges look reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible in this scan. There is visible toning/aging across the card stock consistent with a 1966-era card, and some light gloss loss is evident; no obvious creases are visible but the watermark prevents full confirmation. A raw grade of 4 (VG-EX) seems most likely given the corner wear and surface aging, with EX (5) possible if corners are sharper than they appear and the surface is cleaner than the photo suggests.