1966 OPC Batman Bat Laffs #43 The Joker — Raw

Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $4.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–6) | — | Batman Bat Laffs 1966 O-Pee-Chee: Card #43 v2 Cesare Romero as The Joker |
![]() | $4.00 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 #43 The Joker Mathbatics OPC BAT LAFFS BATMAN TV SHOW TRADING CARD |
![]() | $5.50 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | Batman Bat Laffs 1966 O-Pee-Chee: Card #43 v1 Cesare Romero as The Joker |
![]() | $8.30 | Buy It Now | 2 (1–3) | — | 1966 O-Pee-Chee Batman Bat Laffs as The Joker Cesar Romero #43 0au4 |
![]() | $10.89 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 O-Pee-Chee Batman Bat Laffs as The Joker Cesar Romero #43 0o5t |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border appears slightly larger than bottom (roughly 55/45 T-B) — not severely off-center but noticeable. The card number badge (43) sits in the lower-right corner of the image area. Corners cannot be assessed with precision at this resolution; they appear to show some rounding consistent with a VG-EX or lower card, with the lower corners looking softer than the upper. Surface shows moderate gloss loss typical of OPC issues of this era; no obvious creases are visible from this single front photo but cannot be ruled out on the back. The photo resolution is insufficient to confirm corner sharpness or detect fine print defects, so the range is deliberately wide — a collector should examine corners and back carefully before accepting this estimate.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L-R), top and bottom borders appear closer to 55/45 — centering is off but not catastrophically so. More concerning is a visible diagonal crease or fold line running through the upper-right quadrant of the image area, which is clearly discernible even at this photo resolution and is a hard grade-limiting defect. Corner wear is evident on at least two visible corners showing rounding consistent with handling. Surface gloss appears reduced with some toning on the white border, typical of OPC stock but more pronounced here. The crease alone is likely to cap this card in the VG (3) range, with the corner wear and centering pushing it toward the lower end of that bracket; a VG-EX (4) would require the crease to be shallower than it appears.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 left-right favoring right), top border appears slightly narrower than bottom (roughly 55/45 top-bottom) — centering is off but not severely so, consistent with EX range. Corners show visible wear with light rounding on at least the visible corners, particularly upper left and lower right, suggesting EX to VG-EX territory. Surface gloss appears moderate with some dulling visible, consistent with honest handling wear over decades; no obvious creases are detectable from this photo but the image resolution limits confidence. Edges appear reasonably intact with typical OPC rough-cut texture which is normal for the issue and not penalized; the back is not visible so staining, creases, or writing on reverse cannot be assessed — range is widened accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border noticeably wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is not the primary concern here. The card shows very heavy overall wear with significant toning and browning across the entire surface, consistent with age and poor storage. All four corners appear heavily rounded and worn. The edges show considerable roughness and fraying beyond what is normal for OPC rough-cut variance. Surface shows substantial gloss loss, soiling, and what appears to be staining or foxing distributed across the card face. The COMC watermark partially obscures the center, making precise surface assessment difficult, but the overall wear pattern strongly suggests a grade in the 1–3 range; the image is colorful enough and intact enough to avoid a PR-1, placing this most likely at GOOD (2).

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L/R favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 55/45 T/B) — centering is off but not severely miscut. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (upper left and lower left appear most worn), consistent with a VG card. Surface shows significant creasing/wrinkling in the upper left quadrant area and general gloss loss across the face, with noticeable toning and light soiling typical of a played or handled card. The card also displays what appears to be a horizontal crease or stress line in the upper portion of the image; back is not visible but surface wear alone places this in the VG to VG-EX range at best, and the crease evidence pushes it toward VG (3) as the most likely grade.
Same card, other grades
TAG ? (0)