1966 OPC Batman Bat Laffs #46 The Joker — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 5 | $3.50 | $10.89 |
| TAG ? | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $3.50 | Buy It Now | pending | — | Batman Bat Laffs 1966 O-Pee-Chee: Card #46 v4 Cesare Romero as The Joker on eBay |
![]() | $4.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | Batman Bat Laffs 1966 O-Pee-Chee: Card #46 v3 Cesare Romero as The Joker on eBay |
![]() | $5.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | Batman Bat Laffs 1966 O-Pee-Chee: Card #46 v2 Cesare Romero as The Joker on eBay |
![]() | $6.00 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | Batman Bat Laffs 1966 O-Pee-Chee: Card #46 v1 Cesare Romero as The Joker on eBay |
![]() | $10.89 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 O-Pee-Chee Batman Bat Laffs as The Joker Cesar Romero #46 0o5t on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L-R), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 60/40 T-B), placing this in moderate-to-significant off-center territory for the horizontal axis. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners visible in the photo (lower left and upper right appear soft/rounded), consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Surface shows some gloss loss and the image photo quality makes it difficult to assess fine print defects or light creases definitively; no obvious heavy creases or staining are visible. The OPC-specific rougher cut edges are noted and not penalized per vintage norms, but the horizontal centering and corner wear keep this in the 3-5 range with 4 (VG-EX) as the most likely grade pending back inspection.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right (roughly 70/30 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 60/40 T/B) — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (upper-left and lower-right appear softer), consistent with a VG-EX range card. Surface gloss appears partially intact but there is evident toning/dullness typical of OPC stock of this era. No obvious hard creases are visible from this image, but the photo compression limits confidence in ruling out light surface creases entirely; the back is unseen. Edge wear appears moderate and consistent with handling. Given the OPC stock (which tends to show wear more readily than Topps), the rounded corners and off-centering point to a PSA 4 VG-EX as the most likely grade, with 3 possible if closer inspection reveals a crease.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (roughly 70/30 L-R favoring right), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 55/45 T-B — centering is off horizontally but not catastrophically so for OPC vintage. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners visible in frame (lower left and upper left appear softer), consistent with EX to VG-EX range. Surface gloss appears present but reduced, with some toning visible on the cream/white border areas typical of OPC stock aging. No creases are discernible from this scan, no staining or writing noted, but the photo resolution limits confident corner and surface assessment — back is unseen, widening the range accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border noticeably narrower than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable but not tight. The prominent watermark obscures the center of the card surface, preventing full surface assessment. Corners show visible rounding at all four tips, consistent with VG-EX to EX range; no corner is sharp. Edges appear slightly rough but this is normal for 1966 OPC stock. The card shows light gloss loss and some toning/aging on the borders typical of this vintage issue; no obvious creases are detectable but the watermark obstruction limits confidence. Given corner rounding and apparent surface wear, VG-EX (4) is the point estimate, with EX (5) possible if surface is cleaner than visible and VG (3) possible if hidden areas show additional wear.
