1966 OPC Batman Bat Laffs #51 The Joker — Raw

Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $10.03 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 O-Pee-Chee Batman Bat Laffs The Joker #51 0o5t |
![]() | $10.32 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 O-Pee-Chee Batman Bat Laffs The Joker #51 0p7e |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (roughly 70/30 left-right skew), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 60/40 top-bottom) — centering is off but not miscut territory. Corners show visible rounding on all four, most notably the top-left and bottom-left corners, consistent with significant handling wear. Surface shows what appears to be a diagonal scratch or light crease line running across the upper portion of the card (visible from upper-left toward center), plus general gloss loss across the image area. Edges appear moderately worn with some roughness, though rough cuts are normal for OPC vintage issues. The COMC watermark obscures surface detail in the lower center, limiting crease/stain assessment; the apparent surface line/crease and rounded corners place this firmly in the VG (3) range, with VG-EX (4) possible if the surface line is a scan artifact, and GOOD (2) possible if the crease is deeper than it appears.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55-60% left / 40-45% right L/R); top border appears modestly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is acceptable but not tight, roughly 60/40 range. The CoMC watermark obscures the center surface, making surface defect assessment difficult. Corners appear to show light rounding on at least the visible lower corners, consistent with an EX (5) card; no sharp razor corners are evident. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious chips or tears visible, consistent with OPC rough-cut norms for this era. No creases are visible from this scan, gloss appears moderate — back is not shown, and the watermark prevents full surface evaluation, so the range is widened accordingly.
Same card, other grades
TAG ? (0)