20,310 live listings tracked8,062 card classes5,038 confirmed salesupdated 5 h ago
1966 Batman

1966 OPC Batman Bat Laffs #6 Bruce Wayne and Dick Grayson

1966 OPC Batman Bat Laffs #6 Bruce Wayne and Dick Grayson
Buy it now on eBay $10.03cheapest of 3 live listings on eBay
3live listings
0confirmed sales
2grades tracked

Every grade of this card

Raw and graded copies tracked side by side. Prices are asking prices and current bids; comps are confirmed sales.
GradeLiveAsking rangeLast confirmed saleEst. grade (ours)
Raw2$10.03 – $10.893.5
SGC 31$66.00

Index grading notes

Estimated grades are this site’s opinion, derived from the seller’s photo and expressed on the PSA scale. Not affiliated with or endorsed by PSA; not a guarantee of any grading outcome.
1966 O-Pee-Chee Batman Bat Laffs Bruce Wayne Dick Grayson #6
Estimated grade: 2 (1–3) · MEDIUM confidence · asking $10.89

Centering: left/right borders appear approximately 55/45 and top/bottom roughly 60/40 — centering itself is not the primary concern. The card displays multiple heavy diagonal creases running across the upper-left quadrant and mid-card area, clearly visible even at this resolution; these are severe surface defects. Corners appear rounded and worn, consistent with a VG or lower grade. There is noticeable gloss loss and the card stock shows significant aging/toning. The combination of multiple heavy creases, rounded corners, and surface wear places this card firmly in the GOOD to VG range (PSA 2–3); the creases alone could push it toward PSA 1-2 territory. The COM watermark and sleeve prevent a fully precise assessment of edge and corner detail.

1966 O-Pee-Chee Batman Bat Laffs Bruce Wayne Dick Grayson #6
Estimated grade: 5 (4–6) · LOW confidence · asking $10.03

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering looks acceptable but resolution limits precision. The CoMC watermark covers much of the surface making corner and surface assessment difficult. Corners at the edges of the photo appear to show slight rounding but no severe wear; the top-left corner looks the softest. White borders show some toning/yellowing consistent with a 1966 vintage card, and there is no visible crease, though the image quality cannot rule one out. Surface gloss and print quality cannot be fully assessed due to the watermark and photo softness; the range 4–6 reflects this uncertainty, with EX (5) as the most likely grade absent hidden flaws.