1966 OPC Batman Black Bat #47 Deadly Robot — Raw

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (~60-65% left, 35-40% right L/R); top border appears slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) - off-center left but not severely so. Corners appear reasonably sharp from this distance with only very light wear visible on the two visible corners (lower-left shows slight softening); no obvious corner rounding consistent with EX-MT range. Surface appears to retain good gloss with no visible creases; print quality looks typical for OPC 1966 vintage with no obvious print snow or heavy toning on the white borders. The perspective angle and image resolution prevent confident corner and edge assessment, widening the range - a closer inspection could push this toward NM (7) if corners are cleaner than they appear, or drop toward EX (5) if surface wear is present that the photo is hiding.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 55/45 T-B) — centering is off but not severely miscut. All four corners show visible rounding and wear, consistent with heavy handling; no corner is sharp. Surface shows notable gloss loss across the face with what appears to be light toning/dullness, and there is possible light surface soiling or paper stress visible in the lower-left quadrant near the explosion artwork. No obvious crease is confirmed from this angle but the lower-left area warrants suspicion. The card presents as a solid VG (3) with corners and surface wear as the primary grade-limiting factors; a 4 is possible if no crease exists on closer inspection, but the rounded corners likely cap it there.

Centering: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border notably wider than bottom (~65/35 T/B), so top-heavy but within EX-MT range on left/right; top/bottom pushes toward EX territory. Corners: all four corners show some rounding — upper right appears the sharpest, lower left and lower right show visible rounding consistent with EX (5) range, no corner is sharp enough for NM-MT. Surface: image shows good color saturation with reasonable gloss retention visible; some print speckling/snow consistent with the vintage OPC/Topps 1966 print process — not penalized heavily. Edges: appear reasonably clean with the expected rough-cut texture normal for this vintage issue; no obvious tears or nicks visible but resolution limits a definitive edge call, and back cannot be assessed for creases or staining.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (approximately 70/30 left-to-right) and top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 60/40 top-to-bottom) — centering is off but not severely so, consistent with EX-MT to NM range. Corners appear to show light rounding on at least two corners (most visible at bottom-left and top-left), consistent with moderate handling wear; no corner is sharp enough to suggest NM-MT or better. Surface shows good color saturation and reasonable gloss retention with no obvious creases visible, though a full crease assessment is not possible from this single front image. Edges appear clean with no major nicks; the rough-cut texture on the right edge is consistent with normal OPC production quality and is not penalized.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (~60/40 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is off but not dramatically so, consistent with EX-MT to NM range. Corners: all four corners appear relatively sharp with only minor rounding visible at this resolution; no obvious blunting or fraying, though the single flat-lay photo makes corner closeup assessment difficult. Surface: gloss appears reasonably intact with no obvious creases, staining, or print defects beyond typical 1966 vintage print snow — artwork reproduction looks clean and vibrant. Edges appear naturally rough-cut as expected for OPC/Topps 1966 vintage stock; no miscut evident. The OPC vs. Topps distinction cannot be confirmed from the front alone. Range is widened slightly given no back view and no corner macro shots.