1966 OPC Batman Black Bat #47 Deadly Robot — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 5 | $6.00 | $46.21 |
| TAG ? | — | — | — |
| KSA 5 | 1 | $49.99 | — |
| KSA 6.5 | 1 | $74.99 | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $6.00 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Black Bat, OPC Canada, #47, EXTREMELY NICE CARD !! on eBay |
![]() | $8.71 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 O-Pee-Chee Batman Black Bat Batman Deadly Robot #47 0au4 on eBay |
![]() | $12.33 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 O-Pee-Chee Batman Black Bat Batman Deadly Robot #47 0o5t on eBay |
![]() | $22.68 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | — | 1966 O-Pee-Chee Batman Black Bat Batman Deadly Robot #47 11bd on eBay |
![]() | $46.21 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | — | 1966 Topps/OPC - Batman Black Bat - Deadly Robot #47 - NRMT on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (~60-65% left, 35-40% right L/R); top border appears slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) - off-center left but not severely so. Corners appear reasonably sharp from this distance with only very light wear visible on the two visible corners (lower-left shows slight softening); no obvious corner rounding consistent with EX-MT range. Surface appears to retain good gloss with no visible creases; print quality looks typical for OPC 1966 vintage with no obvious print snow or heavy toning on the white borders. The perspective angle and image resolution prevent confident corner and edge assessment, widening the range - a closer inspection could push this toward NM (7) if corners are cleaner than they appear, or drop toward EX (5) if surface wear is present that the photo is hiding.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~65-70% left / 30-35% right), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 top/bottom) — left-to-right centering is a meaningful issue. Corners: all four corners show visible rounding and softening, consistent with a VG card; no corner is sharp. Edges: edges appear slightly rough but that is normal for OPC/1966 vintage cuts; no clean knife-edge. Surface: gloss appears heavily worn or absent across much of the card face, with visible surface wear and possible light creasing in the lower left quadrant near the explosion art — the dark printing makes this hard to confirm definitively. Overall the card presents at VG (3) with the possibility of a light crease pushing it toward GOOD (2) or slightly better condition landing at VG-EX (4) if the surface is cleaner than it appears.

Centering estimate: left border visibly narrower than right (approx 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (approx 55/45 T-B) — centering is acceptable for EX range. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding on all four, most visible at bottom-left and top-left, consistent with a 4-5 grade. Surface shows some print wear/toning typical of the era but no obvious creases visible from this photo. Edges appear reasonably clean with no egregious chipping, though the rough-cut texture normal for 1966 OPC stock is present; back cannot be assessed and a reverse crease or staining could pull this below 5.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border marginally wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — acceptable for the grade range. Corners appear reasonably sharp at this resolution; upper-left and lower-left show slight softening but no obvious rounding; right-side corners harder to assess cleanly due to COMC watermark. Surface gloss appears present with no obvious creases or heavy print defects visible; some minor print texture consistent with OPC stock. The COMC watermark obscures the center surface, preventing a confident read on print snow or surface wear, and no corner closeups are available, so the range is widened accordingly — a strong EX-MT (6) is the most likely single grade, but NM (7) is reachable if corners prove sharper than they appear and EX (5) applies if edge or surface wear is more pronounced on inspection.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (~60/40 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is off but not dramatically so, consistent with EX-MT to NM range. Corners: all four corners appear relatively sharp with only minor rounding visible at this resolution; no obvious blunting or fraying, though the single flat-lay photo makes corner closeup assessment difficult. Surface: gloss appears reasonably intact with no obvious creases, staining, or print defects beyond typical 1966 vintage print snow — artwork reproduction looks clean and vibrant. Edges appear naturally rough-cut as expected for OPC/Topps 1966 vintage stock; no miscut evident. The OPC vs. Topps distinction cannot be confirmed from the front alone. Range is widened slightly given no back view and no corner macro shots.