1966 OPC Batman Blue Bat #38B Beware the Batarang — Raw

Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $6.28 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 O-Pee-Chee B Series (Blue Bat Logo) Batman Beware The Batarang #38B 0t5 |
![]() | $6.79 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 O-Pee-Chee B Series (Blue Bat Logo) Batman Beware The Batarang #38B 1p5 |
![]() | $12.03 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 O-Pee-Chee B Series (Blue Bat Logo) Batman Beware The Batarang #38B 0a1 |
![]() | $12.33 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 O-Pee-Chee B Series (Blue Bat Logo) Batman Beware The Batarang #38B 2w3 |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (~60% of right border width), suggesting left/right ratio of roughly 65/35 or worse; top border appears slightly thinner than bottom, perhaps 55/45 top/bottom — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show visible rounding at all four corners, most pronounced at the bottom-left and top-right, consistent with a VG to VG-EX range. Surface exhibits noticeable wear and gloss loss across the image area, with what appears to be light handling creasing or surface scuffing visible particularly in the lower-center region, though the COMC watermark obscures a definitive crease assessment. Edges show typical rough-cut texture normal for OPC issues and do not independently penalize the grade, but the combination of rounded corners, gloss loss, and probable surface wear points to a PSA 3 (VG) as most likely, with a slim chance of 4 (VG-EX) if the surface wear is shallower than it appears and no hard crease is present on the back.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (approximately 75/25 left-right), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 60/40 top-bottom), indicating off-center but not miscut. Corners show visible rounding and wear on all four corners, most pronounced at upper-left and lower-left, consistent with a VG to VG-EX range. Surface shows significant soiling, toning, and wear patterns particularly in the upper-left quadrant with what appears to be dark staining or paper stress near the top-left corner; the COMC watermark prevents full surface assessment. Edges appear rough but this is typical of OPC cuts; the overall wear pattern, corner rounding, and surface soiling collectively suggest a PSA 3 (VG) is most likely, with a 4 possible if the surface issues are lighter than they appear under the watermark and a 2 possible if there is an undetected crease.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (approximately 60/40 left-right favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 55/45 top-bottom) — within acceptable range, no severe miscut detected. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding, particularly visible on the lower-left and upper-left corners, consistent with EX to VG-EX range. Surface shows some gloss loss and mild toning on the white border areas typical of OPC stock from this era, no creases are visible in this photo though the CoMC watermark obscures the center. Edges appear reasonably clean with the expected rough-cut texture normal for 1966 OPC issues; back condition unknown and could shift the grade downward.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (~60% left / 40% right L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show visible rounding on all four, most apparent at upper-left and lower-left, consistent with heavy handling. Surface shows significant wear including what appears to be a horizontal crease or fold running across the mid-section of the card, with associated gloss loss and possible paper stress visible even through the CoMC watermark. Edges show moderate roughness consistent with OPC vintage stock but with some additional wear beyond normal rough-cut characteristics. The overall wear pattern — rounded corners, visible surface crease, notable gloss loss — points to a VG (3) grade, though the creasing could push this toward a GOOD (2) on closer inspection; the back is unseen and could further affect the grade.