1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #18 Batman — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 6 | $9.99 | $19.80 |
| TAG ? | 1 | $9.95 | — |
| CGC ? | — | — | — |
| PSA 5 | 2 | $60.00 | $60.00 |
| PSA 7 | 2 | $79.95 | $95.00 |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $4.95 | Auction | pending | — | 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs Trading Card #18 on eBay |
![]() | $6.99 | Auction | 4 (3–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #18 on eBay |
![]() | $10.32 | Buy It Now | 2 (1–3) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs Batman Adam West (No Movie Promo on Back) #18 0p7e on eBay |
![]() | $11.47 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs Batman Adam West (No Movie Promo on Back) #18 0p7e on eBay |
![]() | $14.05 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–7) | +$3.95+9% · ask $48.00 | 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs Batman Adam West (No Movie Promo on Back) #18 0ba6 on eBay |
![]() | $19.80 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | $-1.80-4% · ask $48.00 | 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs Batman Adam West (Movie Promo on Back) #18 0nr3 on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (~60-65% of right border width), top border appears somewhat narrower than bottom — rough L/R ~65/35, T/B ~60/40, suggesting moderate off-centering but not severe. Corner detail is obscured by scan resolution and slight image softness; the lower-left corner appears to show some rounding or wear, and the upper corners look slightly soft but not dramatically rounded. Surface gloss is difficult to assess from this scan — the image appears slightly flat/matte in tone, consistent with some gloss loss, but scan toning may be responsible. No obvious creases are visible but the scan quality and slight warping of the card edges (visible at top) raise concern about possible handling wear; the card stock appears intact without tears or major damage. Given the image limitations, a confident call is not possible — VG-EX (4) is the point estimate, with the range spanning VG (3) to EX-MT (6) depending on corner and surface condition not fully resolvable here.

Centering: left border appears roughly equal to right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is not the primary concern here. The lower-left corner shows visible paper loss or a torn/chipped edge — this is severe damage consistent with a PR-FR to GOOD range. The bottom edge appears rough and ragged, consistent with a corner tear rather than just a vintage rough cut; upper-left corner also shows stress. Surface gloss appears reduced with likely wear, though the scan grain makes definitive surface assessment difficult. The combination of apparent corner/edge damage and possible paper loss caps this card in the 1–3 range; absent a confirmed crease the point estimate lands at 2 (GOOD), but the torn lower-left corner could push this to a 1.5 qualifier or PR.

Centering estimate: left border appears roughly 10-12% narrower than right border (approximately 60/40 L/R favoring right), top border appears slightly wider than bottom at roughly 55/45 T/B — centering is off but not dramatically so. Corners: all four corners show visible rounding/softening; no sharp points are apparent at this resolution, consistent with VG-EX to EX range. Surface shows some gloss loss and what appears to be light wear consistent with age; no obvious creases are visible from this image but the photo resolution and angle prevent confident crease assessment. Edges appear reasonably intact for a vintage 1966 Topps card — rough-cut texture is expected and not penalized; overall the card reads mid-grade, most likely VG-EX (4), but corner rounding could push it to VG (3) under close inspection, or light wear only might support EX (5); the back and sharper corner imagery would be needed to narrow this range.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (approx 55/45 L/R), top border noticeably narrower than bottom (approx 60/40 T/B) — centering is fair but not problematic for a grade ceiling. Corners cannot be assessed with precision from this scan distance; no obvious hard creases or folds visible on the surface, and the photo image retains reasonable color saturation suggesting gloss is at least partially intact. The ComC watermark obscures the center-lower surface, preventing confident assessment of print defects or surface wear in that region. White borders show some toning/aging consistent with vintage 1966 stock, which is expected and not penalized heavily; rough cut edges appear normal for this issue. Without corner close-ups or a back scan, the range must remain wide — a well-preserved example could grade EX to NM range, but hidden corner rounding or surface wear could push this into VG-EX territory.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L-R), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 55/45 T-B — centering is a concern but not catastrophic. The COMC watermark obscures much of the surface, making definitive surface assessment impossible; no obvious creases are visible through the overlay but cannot be ruled out. Corners appear to show light-to-moderate rounding consistent with an EX to VG-EX range; no sharp corners are evident at this resolution. Gloss appears present but subdued, consistent with light wear; white borders show some toning typical of the 1966 Topps Batman issue. The watermark obstruction forces a wide range — a clean surface would support a 5-6, but hidden wear or a crease could drop this to a 4.
