21,260 live listings tracked4,947 card classes311 confirmed salesupdated 0 min ago
1966 Batman

1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #22 Batman and Robin

1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #22 Batman and Robin
Buy it now — $5.00 ›cheapest of 11 live listings on eBay
11live listings
0confirmed sales
5grades tracked

Every grade of this card

Raw and graded copies tracked side by side. Prices are asking prices and current bids; comps are confirmed sales.
GradeLiveAsking rangeLast confirmed saleEst. grade (ours)
Raw9$5.00 – $25.553.9
TAG ?2$5.19 – $6.304.0
CGC 50
CGC 60
CGC 6.50

Index grading notes

Estimated grades are this site’s opinion, derived from the seller’s photo and expressed on the PSA scale. Not affiliated with or endorsed by PSA; not a guarantee of any grading outcome.
Batman 1966 Topps  Bat Laffs Card # 22 Batman and Robin
Estimated grade: 3 (2–4) · MEDIUM confidence · asking $25.55

Centering estimate: left/right borders appear roughly 60/40 to 65/35 — acceptable — and top/bottom appears similarly within 65/35 range, so centering is not the primary issue here. The surface shows significant cracking/crazing or creasing lines visible across the image area, particularly in the lower-left and center regions, which is the dominant grade-killer on this card. Corners appear rounded with visible wear, consistent with a VG to VG-EX range at best, but the surface cracking/creasing pulls the grade down toward VG or lower. Gloss appears largely lost. The snap holder obscures fine corner and edge detail, widening the range; the crack pattern on the surface strongly suggests at least one hard crease, placing this card most likely in the PSA 3 (VG) neighborhood.

1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #22 Batman and Robin VG/EX Very
Estimated grade: 4 (3–5) · LOW confidence · asking $20.00

Centering estimate: left/right borders appear roughly 60/40 off-center to the right; top/bottom appears approximately 55/45 favoring top — centering is noticeably off but not severely miscut, no adjacent card printing visible. Corners appear to show light-to-moderate rounding consistent with a VG-EX to EX range, though the low-resolution and dark photo prevent definitive corner assessment. Surface gloss appears partially intact with some visible wear; no obvious heavy creases are detectable but the image quality is insufficient to rule out light surface creases. The seller's VG/EX self-assessment of 4 seems plausible given visible wear signals, but the poor photo quality forces a wide range — collector should request sharper, well-lit closeup photos of all four corners and the surface before purchasing.

1966 Bat Laffs Batman Robin Burt Ward Adam West (No Movie Pr
Estimated grade: 5 (4–6) · LOW confidence · asking $14.33

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right border, suggesting approximately 65-70% left bias (L/R ~65/35 or worse); top and bottom borders look more balanced, roughly 55/45 T/B. The ComC watermark blocks the center of the card preventing full surface assessment. Corners are difficult to resolve at this image resolution but appear to show some rounding/wear, consistent with EX to VG-EX range. Edges look reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible, and the photo image area shows no apparent major creases though the surface gloss cannot be reliably assessed. Given the left-heavy centering and corner ambiguity, a range of 4-6 is appropriate with EX (5) as the point estimate, but the low-resolution ComC thumbnail photo warrants low confidence — a higher-quality image could shift this meaningfully in either direction.

1966 Bat Laffs Batman Robin Burt Ward Adam West (No Movie Pr
Estimated grade: 3 (2–4) · MEDIUM confidence · asking $10.03

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (~60/40 L/R favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is off but not severely miscut. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (lower-left most evident), consistent with a VG to VG-EX range. Surface shows general gloss loss and what appears to be light handling wear or possible light creasing in the lower portion of the card, though the COMC watermark obscures precise assessment. Edges appear rough-cut which is normal for 1966 Topps vintage production and should not be penalized; overall condition signals moderate wear placing this card solidly in the VG (3) neighborhood, with VG-EX (4) possible if the surface wear is lighter than it appears under compression.