1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #23 Batman and Robin — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 6 | $5.13 | $14.63 |
| TAG ? | — | — | — |
| CGC ? | — | — | — |
| CGC 2.5 | — | — | — |
| CGC 3 | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-14 | $7.99 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Batman Bat Laffs #23 Batman and Robin |
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $5.13 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 Bat Laffs Batman Robin Burt Ward Adam West (No Movie Promo on Back) #23 7ut on eBay |
![]() | $7.99 | Buy It Now | 3 (3–4) | — | 1966 TOPPS BATMAN BAT LAFFS #23 BATMAN ROBIN WHAT IS A BAT VG on eBay |
![]() | $10.62 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 BATMAN BAT LAFFS COLOR SERIE ORIGINAL HIGH GRADE NO23 BATMAN ROBIN NO187 on eBay |
![]() | $12.32 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Bat Laffs Batman Robin Burt Ward Adam West (No Movie Promo on Back) #23 e6p on eBay |
![]() | $14.63 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Bat Laffs Batman Robin Burt Ward Adam West (No Movie Promo on Back) #23 4g8 on eBay |
![]() | $14.63 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 Bat Laffs Batman Robin Burt Ward Adam West (No Movie Promo on Back) #23 4g8 on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (approximately 70/30 L/R), top and bottom borders appear roughly 55/45 T/B — centering is off but not catastrophically miscut. All four corners show visible rounding and wear; no sharp corners are evident even at this resolution. The card surface shows general gloss loss and what appears to be surface wear or light soiling, consistent with heavy handling; the COMC watermark obscures the center and prevents a full surface read. Edges appear rough but rough cuts are normal for this 1966 Topps issue and should not be over-penalized. Given rounded corners, apparent gloss loss, and possible light creasing (cannot confirm crease presence definitively due to watermark obstruction), a VG (3) is the most likely grade, with VG-EX (4) possible if corners are better than they appear and no crease is present, and GOOD (2) possible if a crease is hiding under the watermark.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border notably wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — not severely off-center but bottom border is tight. Corners show visible rounding consistent with a VG grade; no sharp points remain on any corner visible in this image. Surface shows some gloss loss and light wear consistent with handling; no obvious hard crease is visible from this angle, though the seller's VG designation and the general wear pattern are consistent with possible light creasing on the back or subtle surface stress not fully resolved in this photo. Edges appear reasonably intact for a 1966 Topps card — rough cut texture is normal for the issue. The overall presentation aligns with a PSA 3 (VG) most likely, with a slight chance of 4 (VG-EX) if corners are slightly better than they appear and no crease is confirmed; confidence is tempered by the angled photo preventing precise corner and edge assessment.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L/R), top and bottom borders look more balanced at approximately 55/45 T/B — the left-heavy horizontal shift is the primary centering concern. Corners appear to have some light rounding, particularly visible on the lower-left and upper-right, consistent with EX to VG-EX range. The white borders show mild toning/age consistent with a 1966 vintage card, and the surface gloss appears partially intact but somewhat dulled in the scan. No creases are visible from this image, but the scan resolution limits confident corner and surface assessment — back condition is unknown and could move the grade in either direction.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (approximately 70/30 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 55/45 T/B), suggesting off-center left-to-right which is a moderate concern but within EX-EX-MT range. Corners appear to have light rounding on at least the visible corners — not sharp enough for NM-MT but not severely rounded; consistent with EX to EX-MT range. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible at this resolution, consistent with normal vintage rough-cut texture for 1966 Topps. Surface gloss appears moderate with no obvious creases visible in the photo, though the scan compression limits crease detection; the seller's title mentions no self-disclosed flaws such as creases. Overall condition reads as EX range with the off-center L/R being the primary grade limiter.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (approximately 70/30 left-right), top and bottom borders appear roughly 55/45 top-heavy — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show visible rounding on all four, most pronounced at the bottom-left and top-right, consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Edges appear intact with no obvious tears or major nicks, consistent with typical rough 1966 Topps cuts. Surface shows some general wear and what appears to be light toning or soiling on the white border areas, with modest gloss loss across the face; no obvious hard creases are visible from this photo though minor surface scuffing cannot be ruled out. Cannot assess the back for creases or staining, and corner rounding visible here caps the ceiling around 5.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~65-70% left-heavy), top border slightly wider than bottom, rough L/R ratio ~65/35 and T/B ~55/45 — centering is off but not catastrophic. All four corners show visible rounding and wear consistent with a VG-range card; no corner appears sharp. Surface shows general gloss loss and what appears to be toning/soiling across the face, with possible light creasing in the lower-left quadrant though the COA watermark partially obscures assessment. Edges appear worn with some fraying consistent with age. The COM watermark and image resolution limit confident corner and crease evaluation, widening the range; true grade could land anywhere from a creased VG (3) to a borderline VG-EX (4) if surface issues are lighter than they appear.