1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #35 Batman and Robin — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 3 | $2.82 | $12.03 |
| TAG ? | — | — | — |
| CGC ? | — | — | — |
| PSA 4 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 (ST) | 1 | $299.95 | — |
| PSA 8 | — | — | — |
| SGC 9 | 1 | $899.99 | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $2.82 | Buy It Now | pending | — | 1966 Batman Bat Laffs # 35 Ptd in Canada on eBay |
![]() | $6.99 | Auction | 4 (3–5) | +$140.51+356% · comp $180.00 | 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #35 Batman and Robin on eBay |
![]() | $12.03 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 BATMAN BAT LAFFS COLOR SERIE ORIGINAL NO35 BATMAN ROBIN SIDECAR NO1714 on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right border (approximately 70/30 left-to-right), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (approximately 55/45 top-to-bottom) — centering is off but not extreme. Corners are difficult to assess at this resolution; they appear to show some rounding or softening, consistent with a VG-EX to EX range, but no razor sharpness is visible. Surface shows acceptable gloss for a vintage 1966 Topps card; no obvious creases are visible in the scan, though the image quality is too limited to rule them out entirely. Edges appear intact with no catastrophic chipping; rough cut texture is normal for this issue and not penalized. The scan resolution and framing prevent confident corner and surface assessment — range is widened accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears noticeably wider than bottom (~65/35 T/B), so top-heavy but not severely out of register. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding on at least two visible corners (bottom left and bottom right appear softened), consistent with a grade-5 EX range. Surface gloss appears reasonably intact with no obvious creases visible in the photo, though the image resolution limits confident crease detection. Edges appear consistent with normal vintage handling; no miscut detected. Back is not visible so paper quality, staining, and reverse condition cannot be assessed — range is widened accordingly.
