1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #37 Aunt Harriet — Raw

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right (~60/40 L/R favoring right), top border slightly narrower than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is off but not catastrophically so. The primary concerns are surface condition: visible foxing/staining spots scattered across the image area (particularly mid-left and center), significant gloss loss evident across the lower half of the card where a reflective but matte-looking surface degradation is apparent, and what appears to be light soiling or paper wear. Corners appear rounded with moderate wear visible at all four tips, consistent with a VG (3) grade. No crease is definitively confirmed from this photo but the surface staining/foxing alone would suppress the grade; if a hidden crease exists on the back, this could fall to a 2.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R acceptable), top border appears noticeably wider than bottom (~65/35 T/B, modest but not severe). Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (upper-left and lower-left appear softer), consistent with VG-EX to EX range. The card shows some overall surface wear with moderate gloss loss visible across the image area, and there appears to be light creasing or handling wear though no sharp crease is definitively confirmed from this photo angle. Edges appear reasonably clean with no major chipping; rough-cut edges are typical for this set and not penalized. The photo angle and resolution limit precise corner and surface assessment — the range is widened accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (roughly 55/45 L/R), top border appears noticeably larger than bottom (roughly 65/35 T/B), so centering is moderate but not severe. Corners appear to show light rounding consistent with EX to VG-EX range — no sharp points visible but no dramatic wear either. Surface shows no obvious creases from this angle, and the card appears to retain decent gloss, though the CoMC watermark obscures the center surface detail significantly, limiting confidence. The wide range (4–6) reflects uncertainty from the watermark obstruction and the single low-resolution scan; a back scan and corner close-ups would be needed to narrow this further.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (approximately 70/30 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 60/40 T/B) — centering is off but not catastrophic for the set. The card shows visible color fading/toning across the entire surface, which is characteristic of this set but is heavier than average here, suggesting gloss loss and surface wear. Corners appear softly rounded — at least two corners (top-left, bottom-right) show visible rounding visible even at this photo distance, consistent with a VG to VG-EX range. No obvious hard crease is visible from the front, but the surface toning and corner wear pull this below EX territory. The camera angle and image resolution limit precise corner and edge assessment; back is unseen, so a hidden crease or staining could push the grade lower.

Centering estimate: left border appears moderately wider than right (~60/40 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is off but not severely miscut, no adjacent card printing visible. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (lower left and upper right appear softened), consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Surface shows some gloss loss and what appears to be light toning/aging typical of 1966 Topps stock; no obvious creases visible from this photo but the image resolution limits crease detection with certainty. Edges appear slightly rough but that is normal for this set's production. Back condition is unknown; seller notes no movie promo on back which is a known variant and does not affect grade.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L/R), top border appears tighter than bottom (roughly 65/35 T/B) - acceptable but not tight enough for 8+. Corners appear reasonably intact with only minor blunting visible, particularly on the upper-left and lower-right corners, consistent with light handling wear. Surface gloss appears present but slightly diminished; no visible creases are detected in this image. The card back is not visible so hidden flaws (creases, staining, paper loss) cannot be ruled out, which warrants widening the range downward; seller claims NM which feels slightly optimistic given the corner softness observed.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears somewhat wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is passable but not tight enough for NM-MT territory. Corners appear reasonably clean with only very minor wear visible, consistent with EX-MT to NM range. Surface gloss appears intact with no obvious creases or staining visible. The seller's NM claim seems slightly optimistic; the card reads more like EX-MT (6) with light corner/edge wear typical of the era, though back condition and corner sharpness under magnification are unknown from this single front photo — range widened accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering looks decent, no severe tilt. Corners: at this photo resolution the corners appear to have light wear — not sharp enough to suggest NM-MT or better, but no obvious rounding that would drop below EX territory; seller's NM claim seems optimistic. Surface: the image shows reasonable gloss retention with no obvious creases or staining visible; some typical print texture consistent with the set. Edges appear intact with no major nicks visible. The back is not shown, which could reveal creases or staining that would lower the grade; widening the range accordingly to account for hidden information on reverse.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55-60% left bias), top border appears narrower than bottom, roughly 60/40 top-to-bottom — centering is passable but not tight. The seller title includes 'READ' which typically signals disclosed flaws, and the note states 'corner wear' — corners visible in the photo show rounding consistent with VG-EX to VG range. Surface gloss appears moderate with some loss, consistent with age. The COMC watermark partially obscures the center of the card, preventing full surface assessment; no creases are visible but cannot be ruled out given the disclosed wear. Edge quality appears typical for the 1966 Topps rough-cut standard. Without corner closeups or back imagery, a wide range of 3–6 is warranted, with a point estimate of 4 (VG-EX) reflecting the disclosed corner wear.

Centering estimate: left/right borders appear roughly 55/45, top/bottom roughly 60/40 - centering is acceptable and not a primary concern. The surface shows significant aging issues: heavy foxing/oxidation spotting scattered across the face of the card, particularly visible on the subject's face and clothing areas, which constitutes meaningful surface damage beyond normal print snow for this set. Corners appear rounded with visible wear, consistent with a VG to VG-EX range; the lower corners look softer than the upper. Gloss appears largely lost across much of the surface. The combination of pronounced surface foxing/staining and rounded corners puts this squarely in the 3 VG range, with a slight chance of 4 VG-EX if the back is clean and corners are slightly better than they appear; the heavy surface spotting alone could drag this to a 2 if PSA judges it as significant staining.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears somewhat narrower than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable but not tight. Corners show mild to moderate rounding visible at all four corners, most notably at the upper-left and lower-right, consistent with an EX to VG-EX range. Surface gloss appears intact with no obvious creases visible in this photo, though the scan's warm orange cast makes subtle surface wear harder to detect definitively. Edges appear reasonably clean with no miscut indicators or adjacent card printing visible; back cannot be assessed from this single front photo, which is the primary source of uncertainty in this range estimate.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55-60% left bias L/R), top border appears moderately wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is off but not severely miscut. The card shows visible aging with notable toning/yellowing on the white borders, which is common for this set but affects grade. Surface gloss appears partially diminished through the sleeve, and at least one corner (lower left) shows visible rounding. The top-loader obscures fine corner detail and edge wear, making precise grading difficult; the wide range reflects this uncertainty. No obvious creases are visible from this angle, but the toning and corner wear suggest a VG-EX to EX range at best.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears modestly larger than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is reasonable by vintage standards, no miscut evident. Corners show light to moderate rounding visible at 2-3 corners, consistent with EX to VG-EX range; no sharp knife-edge corners remain but no severe blunting either. Surface shows the expected color toning/warmth typical of 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs stock; no obvious creases detected from this view but the image resolution and slight angle limit crease detection confidence. Edges appear intact with no major chips or tears; overall presentation suggests a well-handled but not heavily abused card, landing most likely at EX (5), with upside to EX-MT (6) if corners are sharper than they appear and no hidden back issues, and downside to VG-EX (4) if light surface creasing is present on the back or corners are more rounded than visible here.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55-60% left), top border appears noticeably wider than bottom (~60-65% top), suggesting moderate off-centering roughly 65/35 L/R and 65/35 T/B — within EX-MT range but borderline. The COMC watermark obscures the surface significantly, making it impossible to confirm creases, print defects, or gloss condition reliably. Corners appear to show mild-to-moderate rounding consistent with an EX grade, though close inspection is blocked. Edges look reasonably clean with no obvious tears or major chips visible. Given the watermark obstruction and inability to assess surface/gloss fully, the range is widened; a VG-EX to EX ceiling feels appropriate pending back inspection and corner closeups.