1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #38 Batman and Robin — TAG (grade unconfirmed)

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 6 | $2.95 | $10.00 |
| TAG ? | 4 | $5.00 | $9.99 |
| CGC ? | — | — | — |
| PSA 6 | — | — | — |
| PSA 7 | 2 | $88.47 | $92.72 |
| SGC 7.5 | — | — | — |
| PSA 9 | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $5.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | Vintage 1966 Batman Topps Bat Laffs #38 Batman and Robin in Bat-copter on eBay |
![]() | $6.75 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | Vintage 1966 Batman Topps Bat Laffs #38 Batman and Robin in Bat-copter on eBay |
![]() | $7.00 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | Vintage 1966 Batman Topps Bat Laffs #38 Batman and Robin in Bat Copter on eBay |
![]() | $9.99 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | TOPPS BATMAN vintage 1966 TV SHOW MOVIE Bat Laffs #38 photo CARD U.S.A EXCELLENT on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (~75-80% right-heavy), top border slightly wider than bottom — approximate L/R ~65/35 and T/B ~55/45, suggesting off-center but not severely miscut territory; no adjacent card printing visible so no miscut call. Corners show visible rounding on at least the lower-left and upper-left, consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Surface gloss appears partially intact but dulled, with some toning evident on the white borders typical of vintage 1966 Topps. No obvious creases are visible in the image though the camera angle and distortion make a definitive crease call impossible; back is unseen. Overall condition reads VG-EX (4) as the point estimate, with EX (5) possible if corners are slightly better than they appear and no back issues exist, and VG (3) if there is hidden creasing or more significant gloss loss.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~65-70% left bias), top border slightly wider than bottom — approximately 65/35 L/R and 60/40 T/B, which is borderline but not catastrophic. Corners show visible rounding at all four corners, most apparent at bottom-left and top-right, suggesting moderate wear consistent with VG-EX to EX range. The card image itself shows some surface wear or scuffing in the center (the photo image looks lightly abraded or scratched mid-card), which is a meaningful surface flaw. Gloss appears partially intact but dulled in areas. No obvious hard crease is visible from this angle, but the surface disturbance and rounded corners push this toward the 4 range; the photo angle and distance limit corner and edge confidence, so the range is widened accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border appears slightly narrower than bottom (roughly 55/45 T-B), centering is passable but not tight. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners visible in the image (lower left and upper left appear softened), consistent with EX to VG-EX range. Surface gloss appears intact with reasonable sheen remaining and no obvious creases detected, though the camera angle limits full confidence. Edges appear reasonably clean with no major nicks visible; some minor border toning typical of the vintage is present on the white borders. Overall the card presents as a solid EX (5) with the possibility of EX-MT (6) if corners are sharper than the photo suggests, or VG-EX (4) if additional wear is hidden by the shooting angle.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is acceptable and not a major deduction. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (lower-left and upper-left most evident), consistent with VG-EX to EX range. Surface shows scattered surface wear, minor dirt/soil speckling across the image area, and what appears to be light handling marks; gloss appears partially retained but reduced. Edges look reasonably clean with no obvious tears but do show light wear consistent with the era. No creases are clearly confirmed from this single photo angle, though surface texture variation in the lower-left quadrant bears watching — the seller's 'Excellent' claim is slightly optimistic but not implausible if no crease is present on the back.