1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #4 Batman and Robin

Every grade of this card
| Grade | Live | Asking range | Last confirmed sale | Est. grade (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 2 | $33.62 – $49.70 | $3.44 2026-10-13 | 2.0 |
| TAG ? | 0 | — | — | — |
| CGC 1 | 0 | — | — | — |
Confirmed sales — all grades
| Date | Grade | Price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | Raw | $3.44 | HIGH |
| 2026-10-08 | Raw | $3.00 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-27 | Raw | $4.08 | HIGH |
Index grading notes

Centering: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is not a primary concern here. The seller note 'READ' in the title suggests self-disclosed issues, and visible edge wear is confirmed by the note at the bottom of the image. Corner wear is visible even at this resolution — at least two corners appear noticeably rounded/soft, consistent with VG to VG-EX range. Surface shows some handling wear and the overall gloss appears diminished; no obvious crease is confirmed from this angle but cannot be ruled out given the condition indicators. The COMC watermark obscures some surface detail, preventing a definitive read on surface condition — the range is widened accordingly to account for possible hidden creases or staining.

Centering appears roughly 60/40 left-to-right and 55/45 top-to-bottom — not the primary concern here. The card shows severe surface wear including multiple visible creases across the face (a prominent diagonal crease runs across the lower-center portion), heavy print snow/foxing scattered across the image, significant color loss and toning, and what appears to be paper stress or surface cracking. All four corners appear heavily rounded and worn. Gloss is essentially absent. The seller's own 'Poor' self-grade is well-supported by the photo; the combination of multiple creases, heavy surface degradation, and extreme corner wear places this firmly in the PR-FR range (PSA 1), with a PSA 2 ceiling only if the creases are shallower than they appear under camera angle. No evidence of writing, tears, or trimming visible, which keeps it off an Authentic qualifier, but this is a heavily distressed example.