1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #45 Batman and Robin — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 13 | $2.95 | $25.84 |
| TAG ? | 1 | $9.99 | — |
| PSA 5 | 1 | $100.00 | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-04 | $2.27 | HIGH · final bid | Batman & Robin 1966 Topps Batman Color Photo #45 Bat Laffs |
| 2026-11-04 | $2.14 | HIGH · final bid | Batman & Robin 1966 Topps Batman Color Photo #45 Bat Laffs |
| 2026-10-20 | $3.97 | HIGH · final bid | Batman Bat Laffs 1966 Batman & Robin "Bat Laffs" #45 Base Set |
| 2026-09-02 | $3.92 | HIGH · final bid | BATMAN & ROBIN 1966 TOPPS BATMAN BAT LAFFS #45 Q3562 |
Live listings
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears slightly thicker than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is reasonably competitive, likely within 65/35 range on both axes. Corners appear intact with only modest wear visible at this resolution; no obvious rounding but fine corner tips are hard to confirm from this scan quality. Surface shows the expected vintage print texture and mild toning on borders consistent with a 55-year-old card; no obvious creases, stains, or major print defects are visible. Gloss loss is modest but present, consistent with an EX-MT range card; back condition and precise corner sharpness cannot be confirmed from this single front image, warranting a wider range.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (~70/30 L/R), top and bottom borders look more balanced (~55/45 T/B) — off-center left is the primary concern. The scan shows toning/aging on the white borders consistent with a 57-year-old card; surface appears to have moderate gloss loss. Corner detail is difficult to assess at this resolution but at least two corners (top-left, bottom-left) show what appears to be rounding or soft wear consistent with VG-EX to EX range. No creases are visible, but the photo compression makes it impossible to confirm surface condition or fine corner wear definitively. Grade range widened due to image resolution limiting corner and edge inspection; a crease hidden in the image could push this to a 3.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border modestly wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is passable but not tight. The white borders show visible toning/aging consistent with the vintage stock. Corner detail is difficult to resolve at this scan resolution, but all four corners show visible wear and rounding — no sharp points are evident, suggesting at least light-to-moderate corner fatigue consistent with VG-EX to EX range. Surface gloss appears partially intact with some dulling; no obvious hard creases are visible in the image, but the image quality is too soft to rule out light surface creases or staining. Without corner closeups or a back-of-card view, the range must remain wide; a grade of 4 (VG-EX) is the most probable single estimate given the apparent corner rounding and toning.

Two sides of the same card are shown side by side — front (card #45) and back — which is helpful. Centering on the front: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears noticeably narrower than bottom (~60/40 T/B), suggesting mild off-centering but not severe. Corners: at this resolution the lower-left and lower-right corners show slight softening/rounding consistent with light handling wear; upper corners appear marginally better but not sharp. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible. Surface shows moderate gloss retention with no obvious creases visible on the front, though the back photo is too dark to assess the back surface thoroughly. No staining or writing noted. The card grades in the EX to VG-EX range; absence of visible creases keeps it out of VG territory, while corner rounding and centering prevent NM-MT consideration.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (approx 55/45 L/R), top border visibly narrower than bottom (approx 60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable for EX range. Corners show light rounding on all four tips, most noticeable at the lower-left and upper-right, consistent with EX to VG-EX wear. Edges appear reasonably clean with no major nicks visible, consistent with a vintage rough-cut norm for this set. Surface shows some toning on the white border and minor gloss reduction but no visible creases; the photo resolution does not allow definitive confirmation of the back or fine surface scratches, so the range is widened accordingly.

Both front and back are visible. Front centering: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border noticeably wider than bottom (~65/35 T/B) — acceptable for vintage but bottom border is tight. Corners appear reasonably sharp with only minor softening visible at the top-right and bottom-right; no obvious rounding or creasing. Surface gloss looks intact with no visible scuffs or print defects beyond typical 1966 Topps snow/print grain. The back shows moderate toning/yellowing consistent with age but no staining or creases apparent. Without corner macro shots this estimate carries inherent uncertainty — corners could be sharper or softer than they appear, and the tight bottom border keeps the ceiling at 7 rather than 8.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears moderately wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable but not tight. The CoMC watermark obscures the lower-center surface making surface condition evaluation difficult there. Corners appear to show some rounding or light wear on at least two visible corners, consistent with an EX range card. White borders show some toning/age appropriate for the vintage. No obvious creases visible from this scan, but the watermark concealment and scan resolution prevent confident assessment of surface wear, print defects, or fine corner condition — the range is widened accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears moderately wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable for EX range. Corners show some rounding visible at the bottom-left and bottom-right corners; top corners appear somewhat better but not sharp enough for NM territory. Surface gloss appears moderate with some dulling consistent with handling; no obvious creases are visible from this photo, which aligns with the seller's EX claim rather than any lower designation. Edges appear reasonably clean with no significant chipping; rough cut texture on edges is normal for this 1966 Topps issue and not penalized. Photo resolution limits definitive assessment of fine print defects, staining, or subtle surface wear, widening the range to VG-EX through EX-MT.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (roughly 55/45 L/R), top border appears moderately wider than bottom (roughly 60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable but not tight-grade quality. Corners appear to have light rounding visible on at least two corners (lower left and upper right show the most wear), consistent with EX-MT to NM range. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible at this resolution, consistent with the vintage rough-cut norm for this issue. Surface shows moderate gloss retention with some light toning typical of 1966 Topps Batman stock; no creases are visible, but the photo resolution limits confident corner and edge assessment — the range is widened accordingly to reflect that limitation.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (approximately 55/45 L/R), top border appears noticeably wider than bottom (approximately 65/35 T/B), so centering is off but not severely so — consistent with EX to EX-MT range. Corners cannot be assessed with precision due to the Comc watermark obscuring the center, but the visible corner regions appear to show light rounding rather than sharp points, suggesting EX (5) territory. Edges look reasonably clean with no obvious tears or major chips visible, consistent with normal 1966 Topps rough-cut characteristics. Surface gloss and any creases or print defects in the central area are completely hidden by the watermark, which is the primary limiter on confidence and range — the true grade could be a 4 if there is hidden crease/wear or a 6 if corners and surface are cleaner than they appear at this resolution.


