1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #49 Pirate — Raw

Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $4.05 | Auction | pending | — | Batman trading card Bat Laffs set number 49 printed in Canada 1966 |
![]() | $4.20 | Auction | pending | — | 1966 Batman (Smaller Version) - BAT LAFFS - Card Number 49 |
![]() | $1.99 | Buy It Now | pending | — | 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs Card # 49 Pirate (VG) |
![]() | $2.49 | Buy It Now | pending | — | 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs Card # 49 Pirate (VG/EX) |
![]() | $2.99 | Buy It Now | pending | — | 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs Card # 49 Pirate (EX) |
![]() | $4.19 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 TOPPS BATMAN # 49 - MADE IN U.S.A. - BAT LAFFS CARD - NO CREASES - LOOK !! |
![]() | $8.00 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #49 Batman Ex |
![]() | $12.00 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Color Bat Laffs #49 Pirate EX+ 7844 |
![]() | $39.99 | Buy It Now | 7 (6–8) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs # 49 Nrmnt + or Better Set Break |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L/R favoring right), top border slightly narrower than bottom (approximately 55/45 T/B) — centering is acceptable but not tight. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding, particularly visible on the lower-left and upper-right corners, consistent with EX to VG-EX range; no razor sharpness remains. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious nicks or tears visible at scan resolution, consistent with normal vintage handling. Surface gloss appears partially intact with some dulling visible; no creases are detected in agreement with the seller's claim, though the single front-only photo limits assessment of print defects and the card back.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border slightly narrower than bottom (~55/45 T/B) - centering is reasonably good, no severe miscut. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding on at least two visible corners (bottom-left and bottom-right appear slightly softened), consistent with an EX range card. Surface gloss appears intact with no obvious creases visible in this photo, which aligns with the seller's EX claim. Edges look clean without significant chipping or fraying typical of the vintage set. The back is not visible, and corner closeups are unavailable, so a crease or more significant wear on the reverse or unseen corners cannot be ruled out - hence the range spans VG-EX to EX-MT.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (roughly 55/45 L/R), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (approximately 55/45 T/B) — centering is acceptable for EX-MT range. Corners appear to have light rounding consistent with EX to EX-MT wear; no corners look sharp-mint but none appear severely rounded either. Surface gloss appears present with minor loss, no visible creases detected in this image. The watermark obscures the bottom edge and lower-left corner area, preventing a definitive corner and edge assessment there, which widens the range; the seller's 'EX+' self-grade aligns with the visible evidence suggesting a PSA 6 point estimate.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears slightly narrower than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is reasonable but not tight enough for NM-MT 8 without closer inspection. Corners appear relatively sharp with only very minor softening visible at the top-left and bottom-right corners under the sleeve glare, consistent with NM range. Edges look clean with no obvious notching or roughness beyond normal vintage rough-cut texture for this set. Surface gloss appears intact with no visible creases or major print defects, though the top-loader glare obscures fine surface detail and prevents confident corner assessment at full magnification. Overall presentation supports a grade in the NM (7) range, with upside to NM-MT (8) if corners prove sharper than they appear, and downside to EX-MT (6) if surface wear is hiding under the sleeve reflection.




