1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #52 Catwoman, the Riddler and Bluebeard — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 3 | $3.99 | $17.99 |
| TAG ? | — | — | — |
| PSA 5 | — | — | — |
| Auto / Authentic | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-01 | $3.55 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Batman (Smaller Version) - BAT LAFFS - Card Number 52 |
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $3.99 | Buy It Now | pending | — | Rare 1966 Topps Batman #52 Bat Laffs Cat-Woman & Riddler Low Grade on eBay |
![]() | $9.99 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 Topps BATT LAFFS #52 Catwoman Riddler VG on eBay |
![]() | $17.99 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | Topps Bat Laffs - 1966 #52 Batman Non-Sport Trading Card Base Set on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (~70/30 left-right), top and bottom borders appear roughly 55/45 — horizontal misregistration is the primary concern. All four corners show visible rounding consistent with a VG or VG-EX card; no corner is sharp. Surface gloss appears reduced with some toning visible in the white border areas, consistent with age. No obvious hard crease is detectable from this scan, but the photo resolution limits certainty about light surface creases; the seller's 'VG' self-assessment aligns with what is visible — PSA 3 is the most likely outcome, with PSA 4 possible if corners are slightly better than they appear and no crease is confirmed on handling.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (approximately 70/30 L-R), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 60/40 T-B), indicating off-center but not miscut territory. All four corners show visible rounding/wear — no sharp points remain, consistent with a VG-EX or lower grade. Surface gloss appears partially intact but with some dulling and age toning visible across the image area, typical of handled vintage stock. Edges appear reasonably clean for a 1966 Topps issue with no obvious tears or major paper loss visible, though the photo angle obscures full edge and corner detail; no creases are clearly visible but cannot be ruled out on the back, warranting range conservatism.
