1966 Topps Batman Bat Laffs #53 Batman — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 12 | $2.84 | $27.50 |
| TAG ? | 1 | $17.78 | — |
| CGC ? | — | — | — |
| PSA 5 | — | — | — |
| PSA 7 | 1 | $199.99 | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-02 | $3.58 | HIGH · final bid | BATMAN 1966 TOPPS BATMAN BAT LAFFS #53 Q3562 |
Live listings
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (~60/40 L/R favoring right), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is off but not severely miscut; no adjacent card printing visible. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (bottom-left and top-left appear blunted), consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Surface gloss appears partially intact with some loss evident, and the white borders show moderate toning/aging typical of the set. No obvious hard creases are visible from this photo, but the image resolution and angle limit confident surface assessment — a crease could be hiding. Given rounded corners and moderate wear, a PSA 4 (VG-EX) is the most likely grade, with EX (5) possible if corners are better than they appear and no hidden creases exist.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L-R), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 60/40 T-B — centering is off but not catastrophically miscut. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners visible in this scan, consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Surface appears to have moderate gloss loss and some light soiling or toning, particularly in the lower portion of the card. The COMC watermark and scan softness prevent confident assessment of fine surface wear, creases, or edge condition, so the range is widened accordingly; no obvious hard crease is detected but cannot be ruled out.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 55/45 T-B) — centering is off but not severely so. The COMC watermark obscures the center of the card face making surface inspection difficult. Corners at the upper-left and lower-left appear to show some rounding/wear consistent with a VG-EX to EX range; upper-right corner looks slightly better but detail is limited. Edges appear intact without obvious splits or tears, and there is some gloss visible suggesting surface is not heavily worn, but border toning and age-appropriate wear are evident. The COMC watermark prevents confident surface assessment — a clean scan or in-hand inspection would be needed to confirm grade; range of 3–5 reflects this uncertainty.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (roughly 70/30 left-heavy L/R), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 55/45 T/B — centering is off but not miscut territory. All four corners show visible rounding and wear, consistent with heavy handling over decades; no corners appear sharp. The surface shows significant scuffing and soiling, particularly in the lower half of the card where dark smudging and abrasion marks are prominent and clearly visible even at this resolution. Gloss appears largely lost. No obvious crease is detectable with certainty from this single photo, but the surface condition and corner wear collectively point to a PSA 3 (VG) grade, with the range extending to 4 if the back is clean and the surface damage is shallower than it appears, or dropping to 2 if a hidden crease is present on the front or back.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border moderately wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is not ideal but not severely off-center. The card shows significant surface wear with visible scratches, scuffing, and what appears to be light soiling or staining across the face of the card. Corners appear rounded — at minimum two corners show visible rounding consistent with a VG grade. Edges show wear consistent with handling. Gloss appears largely lost across the surface. The combination of rounded corners, surface scuffing/scratching, and general gloss loss places this solidly in the VG (3) range, with VG-EX (4) possible only if corners are better than they appear and surface damage is lighter than the photo suggests; GOOD (2) is the floor if any hidden creases are present on the back.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (roughly 55/45 L/R), top border appears somewhat wider than bottom (roughly 60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable for a mid-grade but not crisp. The white borders show some toning/yellowing consistent with age on a 1966 Topps card, which is normal for the vintage. Corners appear to show light-to-moderate rounding at two or more corners — the lower corners in particular look soft, suggesting EX to VG-EX territory. Surface gloss appears partially intact with some dulling visible; no obvious creases are detectable from this photo, but the scan angle and resolution limit confidence significantly. The rough cut edges are typical of 1966 Topps production and are not penalized. Back cannot be assessed; hidden flaws (creases, stains, paper loss) could pull the grade lower.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears modestly wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — acceptable for vintage but not tight. The COMC watermark obscures the lower-center surface making crease detection in that zone impossible. Corners appear to show light rounding at minimum — the lower corners are partially hidden by the watermark and the prone figure in the image, preventing confident corner assessment. Surface gloss appears moderate with no obvious heavy wear or staining visible, but the image resolution and watermark limit confidence. Edges appear reasonably clean for a 1966 Topps issue. The range is widened due to the watermark obstruction; a crease beneath the watermark or more severe corner rounding than visible could push this to a 4 or lower.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears somewhat narrower than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable, no severe miscut evident. White borders show mild toning/yellowing consistent with vintage 1966 Topps stock. Corners appear to have light-to-moderate rounding — no sharp points visible at any corner, suggesting EX to VG-EX range; no corners look severely worn or heavily blunted. Surface gloss appears partially present with some loss, consistent with age handling; no obvious creases visible from this scan but the photo resolution limits crease detection on the image surface. Overall a presentable raw copy in the EX to EX-MT range, with corner condition being the primary grade limiter.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right (roughly 70/30 left-right), top and bottom borders look closer to 55/45 — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show visible light rounding on at least two corners visible from this angle, consistent with EX range wear. Surface appears to have retained reasonable gloss with no obvious creases visible, though the scan resolution limits fine surface inspection. Edges look intact without major chips; rough cut texture is normal for this 1966 Topps issue and not penalized. The overall presentation suggests EX (5) as the most likely grade, with EX-MT (6) possible if corners are sharper than they appear and VG-EX (4) if centering is worse than estimated on the unviewed back.

Centering: left/right borders appear roughly 60/40 favoring left, top/bottom roughly 55/45 favoring top — centering is off but not severely miscut. Corners: all four corners show visible rounding and softening consistent with significant handling wear; no sharp points remain. Surface: noticeable dirt speckling and surface grime visible across the face, with some apparent gloss loss and possible light scuffing — edges appear worn with some fraying. The photo angle and moderate resolution limit precise assessment of potential creases, but the overall wear pattern and rounded corners point firmly to the VG (3) range, with a floor of 2 if closer inspection reveals a crease or staining, and a ceiling of 4 if surface wear is shallower than it appears here.

