1966 Topps Batman Black Bat #9 Face of the Joker — TAG (grade unconfirmed)

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 10 | $84.99 | $1,250.00 |
| TAG ? | 3 | $499.00 | $500.00 |
| PSA 2 (MK) | 1 | $299.00 | — |
| PSA 2 | — | — | — |
| SGC 2 | — | — | — |
| PSA 2.5 | — | — | — |
| PSA 3 | 1 | $400.00 | — |
| CGC 3.5 | 1 | $399.99 | — |
| SGC 3.5 | — | — | — |
| PSA 3.5 | 1 | $650.00 | — |
| PSA 4 | 5 | $499.00 | $749.99 |
| SGC 4 | 1 | $500.00 | — |
| SGC 4.5 | 1 | — | — |
| PSA 5 (MK) | — | — | — |
| CGC 5 | — | — | — |
| PSA 5 | 11 | $500.00 | $1,399.00 |
| SGC 5 | 1 | — | — |
| PSA 6 | 6 | $999.00 | $1,699.00 |
| SGC 6 | — | — | — |
| PSA 7 | 4 | $1,299.00 | $2,900.00 |
| KSA 7 | 1 | $445.00 | — |
| CGC 7 | 1 | $1,999.99 | — |
| SGC 7 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 (OC) | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 | 5 | $3,750.00 | $19,999.99 |
| BGS 8.5 | — | — | — |
| PSA 9 (OC) | 1 | — | — |
| PSA 9 | — | — | — |
| Auto / Authentic | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-13 | $91.00 | HIGH · final bid | Vintage 1966 Topps Black Bat card #9 "Face of the Joker" VG - Verified |
| 2026-09-11 | $227.50 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman Black Bat #9 Face Of The Joker Vintage DC NPPI Rooki |
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $31.00 | Auction · 3 bids | 3 (3–4) | Vintage 1966 Topps Black Bat card #9 "Face of the Joker" VG on eBay |
![]() | $499.00 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | 1966 Topps Batman Black Bat #9 Face of the Joker Vintage DC Comics Card on eBay |
![]() | $500.00 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | 1966 Topps Batman Black Bat #9 Face of the Joker Vintage DC Comics Card on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border noticeably wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is imperfect but not severely off-center. Corners show visible rounding consistent with a VG (3) grade; no corners appear sharp under this photo resolution. Surface gloss appears reduced with some cloudiness/wear visible across the face of the card, consistent with handling. The seller's own VG assessment aligns with what is visible — rounded corners and gloss loss push this to the PSA 3 range, with a PSA 4 possible only if corners are slightly better than they appear under the angle; no crease is clearly confirmed from this image though cannot be ruled out. Raw card, no slab obstruction, but the slight shooting angle and distance limit definitive corner and surface assessment.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border moderately narrower than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable and not the primary grade driver here. The top edge shows significant surface wear, fraying, and what appears to be paper separation or peeling along the upper-left corner area, which is the most damaging visible defect. All four corners show obvious rounding with the top-left appearing the worst; bottom corners are difficult to assess precisely due to the card stand but appear moderately worn. Surface gloss appears largely lost with visible scuffing and toning consistent with well-loved vintage handling; no creases are clearly visible from this angle but cannot be ruled out on the reverse. The card sits solidly in VG (3) territory with the upper-edge paper wear and rounded corners being the primary grade anchors; a VG-EX (4) ceiling requires cleaner edges and corners than are visible here.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears moderately wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable, no severe off-center issue. Corners: at this resolution and angle, corners appear to have light rounding on at least two corners (likely bottom corners), suggesting mild wear consistent with EX-MT to NM range; no sharp razor corners visible but no severe blunting either. Surface: gloss appears reasonably intact with no obvious creases, staining, or print defects visible; some expected vintage print texture/snow is consistent with the set. Edges appear clean with no major chipping. Key limitations: flat-on-carpet angle compresses corner detail; no back visible; no tight corner macro shots — range widened accordingly to account for hidden wear.