1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat #12B Renegade Roulette — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 4 | $5.42 | $19.99 |
| TAG ? | 1 | $14.99 | — |
| PSA 8 | 1 | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-15 | $12.50 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman B Series Set-Break # 12B Renegade Roulette EX-EXMINT |
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $5.42 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | — | 1966 Topps Batman B Series (Blue Bat Logo) Blue Back Renegade Roulette #12B 10k8 on eBay |
![]() | $7.50 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat #12B, VERY NICE CARD!!! NO CREASES !!! JOKER !! on eBay |
![]() | $12.10 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–6) | — | BATMAN TRADING CARD 12B 1966 TOPPS BLUE BAT RENEGADE ROULETTE on eBay |
![]() | $19.99 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat #12B Renegade Roulette Cowl Back Novack Estate on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (approx 60/40 L-R), top border slightly wider than bottom (approx 55/45 T-B) — centering is acceptable in the EX-MT to NM range. Corners appear to have light rounding visible on at least two corners (notably bottom-left and top-right), consistent with a grade in the EX to EX-MT range. Surface shows reasonable gloss retention with no obvious creases visible, though print snow typical of the 1966 Topps Batman issue is present. Edges appear reasonably clean with the slightly rough cut normal for this vintage issue; no adjacent card printing is visible so no miscut concern. Back cannot be assessed from this photo, and corner closeups are not available, so the range is widened accordingly — a strong EX-MT (6) is the most likely single grade.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border slightly narrower than bottom (roughly 60/40 T-B), placing centering in the EX to EX-MT range and not an immediate grade killer. Corners show visible light rounding on at least two corners visible from this angle — particularly the upper-left and lower-left — suggesting wear consistent with EX (5) territory rather than EX-MT (6). Surface appears to retain reasonable gloss with no obvious creases visible, consistent with the seller's no-crease claim. Edges appear reasonably clean with normal vintage roughness for this issue; card back is not visible, limiting full assessment.

Centering estimate (approximate through plastic/angle distortion): left border appears noticeably wider than right (~70/30 L/R), top border appears wider than bottom (~65/35 T/B) - centering is off but not catastrophically so, likely landing in EX-MT or below range. Corner visibility is severely limited by the acrylic holder and angle; what can be seen suggests at least light to moderate rounding on visible corners, consistent with VG-EX to EX territory. Surface appears to have some gloss remaining but the plastic glare prevents confident assessment of creases, print defects, or staining. The white borders show some typical vintage toning. Without a flat, well-lit front-only photograph with corner closeups and no obstructing holder, a confident grade cannot be assigned - the wide range reflects genuine uncertainty caused by the angled, plastic-obstructed image.

Centering: left border appears slightly wider than right (approx 60/40 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (approx 55/45 T/B) — acceptable for the grade range. Corners: upper-left corner shows the most visible wear with a slight blunt/rounded appearance; upper-right and lower-left appear reasonably sharp but not crisp; lower-right is partially obscured by the bat-logo graphic making assessment difficult. Surface: there is moderate print texture consistent with 1966 Topps production norms; gloss appears reduced but present — no obvious creases or staining visible in this photo, though the scan compression makes it hard to rule out light surface wear. Edges appear intact without major chipping; the rough-cut character normal for this issue is present but not penalized. Back is not visible, so any crease or staining there would drop the grade; the range is widened accordingly.