21,260 live listings tracked5,537 card classes832 confirmed salesupdated 0 min ago
1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat #15

1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat #15 — Raw

1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat #15 — Raw
Buy it now — $17.95 ›cheapest of 1 live listing on eBay
1live listings
0confirmed sales

Asking range

Not enough history yet. The index needs 2 listings priced at the same time across 3 intervals before it will draw a range - one seller’s asking price is an anecdote, not a market.

Confirmed sales

No confirmed sales recorded yet. The index logs a sale only after a listing verifiably ends — auction results at the final bid. As tracked auctions close, comps appear here automatically.

Live listings

Asking prices and current bids — not values. Est. grade is our opinion from the seller’s photo, on the PSA scale — see notes below.
PriceTypeEst. grade (ours)Est. ROI after gradingListing (opens eBay)
1966 Topps Blue Bat #15 “Joker Wishes Robin Well” NM $17.95Buy It Now7 (6–8)1966 Topps Blue Bat #15 “Joker Wishes Robin Well” NM

Index grading notes

Estimated grades are this site’s opinion, derived from the seller’s photo and expressed on the PSA scale. Not affiliated with or endorsed by PSA; not a guarantee of any grading outcome.
1966 Topps Blue Bat #15 “Joker Wishes Robin Well” NM
Estimated grade: 7 (6–8) · MEDIUM confidence · asking $17.95

Centering: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R); top border appears slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is quite good, no OC concern. Corners: at photo resolution all four corners appear reasonably sharp with no obvious rounding or creasing visible, though the lower-left corner near the bat logo is slightly obscured by the card's own design element making it harder to assess — upper corners look clean. Edges appear smooth and consistent with a normal vintage cut for this series; no miscut evidence. Surface shows good gloss retention with no obvious print snow, staining, or creases visible; the white borders appear clean without significant toning. The seller's NM claim is plausible but back condition, which cannot be assessed here, and any hidden micro-wear on corners under close inspection are the key unknowns that separate a 7 from an 8.