1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat #31B Batman Bucks Badman — TAG (grade unconfirmed)

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 8 | $3.00 | $32.00 |
| TAG ? | 4 | $11.09 | $19.99 |
| PSA 4 | 1 | $5.25 | — |
| PSA 6 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 | 1 | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $11.09 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | Vintage 1966 Topps Batman Bucks Badman #31B Trading Card DC Non-Sport Card on eBay |
![]() | $14.00 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | 1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat #31B Batman Bucks Badman Cowl Back Vintage Card on eBay |
![]() | $19.99 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | Vintage 1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat Logo #31B BATMAN BUCKS BADMAN on eBay |
![]() | $19.99 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | Vintage 1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat Logo #31B BATMAN BUCKS BADMAN on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (~70/30 L/R), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — left-to-right centering is the primary concern. All four corners show visible rounding and wear, consistent with a VG-range card; no corner is sharp. The white borders show moderate toning/soiling, and there is visible surface wear and gloss loss across the card face. No obvious hard crease is detectable from this angle, but the photo perspective and lighting make it difficult to rule one out definitively — the card appears to have some waviness that may indicate light creasing. Edges appear rough but this is consistent with normal 1966 Topps rough-cut production. Overall condition points to a PSA 3 (VG) with a possible stretch to 4 if the surface is cleaner than it appears and no crease is confirmed on back inspection.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55L/45R), top border appears moderately wider than bottom (~60T/40B) — centering is acceptable but not tight. Corners: all four corners show some rounding/softening visible at this resolution, no razor points; upper-left and lower-left appear slightly more worn than the right side corners, consistent with EX-range card. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible, though the rough-cut texture normal for 1966 Topps is present. Surface shows modest gloss loss and some light print aging/toning on the white border areas typical of this 57-year-old set; no creases are visible in the image but the back cannot be assessed. Grade range of 4–6 reflects corner softening placing it in EX territory, with uncertainty spread due to inability to examine back, true gloss level, and fine corner detail.

Centering estimate: left border ~40%, right border ~60% L/R; top border ~45%, bottom border ~55% T/B — off-center left-to-right but not severely so, roughly 60/40 range. Corners: the top-left corner appears slightly soft/rounded, the bottom-left corner shows visible rounding and possible light wear; top-right and bottom-right look marginally better but not sharp. Surface gloss appears moderate with some toning on the white border areas consistent with age; no obvious creases are visible from this photo. Edge cut appears slightly rough on the left side but within normal vintage tolerance for this set. The combination of off-center left-right orientation, corner wear on at least two corners, and border toning suggests EX (5) as the most likely grade, with EX-MT (6) possible if corners are sharper than they appear and the back is clean, and VG-EX (4) possible if hidden wear exists.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (roughly 55/45 T-B), so centering is off but within EX-EX-MT range. Corners: all four corners show some rounding/blunting visible at this resolution - upper left and lower right appear the softest, consistent with light to moderate wear suggesting EX territory. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious nicks or tears, consistent with typical vintage rough-cut handling for this set. Surface gloss appears moderate with some loss visible, no creases or staining detected, though the photo angle and sleeve shadow on the left side prevent full confidence on surface and back condition - range is widened accordingly.