1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat #32B Frozen by Frost — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 6 | $2.50 | $9.50 |
| TAG ? | 2 | $14.00 | $19.99 |
| PSA 6 | — | — | — |
| PSA 7 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-15 | $5.50 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman B Series Set-Break # 32B Frozen By Frost VG-VGEX *GM |
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $0.79 | Auction · 1 bids | pending | — | 1966 Topps Batman Series B Set-Break # 32B Frozen By Frost VG-VGEX *GMCARDS* on eBay |
![]() | $2.50 | Buy It Now | pending | — | 1966 Topps Batman Frozen By Frost #32B on eBay |
![]() | $4.58 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 TOPPS BATMAN # 32B " FROZEN BY FROST " U.S.A. - BLUE BAT BACK - LOOK !!! on eBay |
![]() | $4.75 | Buy It Now | 2 (1–3) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Frozen By Frost Blue Bat #32B C336 on eBay |
![]() | $9.45 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman B Series (Blue Bat Logo) Blue Back Frozen by Frost #32B 0n8 on eBay |
![]() | $9.50 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 TOPPS BATMAN BLUE BAT #32B FROZEN BY FROST FREE SHIPPING on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (approx 70/30 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (approx 55/45 T/B), so horizontal centering is a meaningful concern. Corners show visible rounding on all four, most pronounced at lower-left and upper-right, consistent with a VG-range card. Surface shows moderate gloss loss and what appears to be light wear/handling marks across the face; no obvious hard creases are visible in this image but the seller's title does not self-disclose a crease, though surface texture suggests some compression or soft creases may be present on close inspection. Edges appear rough but within normal vintage cutting tolerance for this set; overall the card presents as a solid VG (3) with the possibility of VG-EX (4) if corners are slightly better than they appear, or GOOD (2) if hidden surface creases exist — range widened accordingly given single-photo limitations.

Centering: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border notably wider than bottom (~65/35 T/B) - centering is a secondary concern given the surface damage. Multiple visible creases are present including a prominent diagonal crease running through the lower center of the card and additional stress lines in the lower left quadrant; this alone caps the grade firmly. All four corners show significant rounding and wear - lower left is particularly damaged with what appears to be paper compression or a bend. Gloss is substantially lost across the surface. The card is a legitimate raw example of this set but condition issues (multiple creases, heavy corner wear, gloss loss) place it squarely in the GOOD to VG range, with the multiple creases and corner damage pushing toward the lower end.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (approx 55/45 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (approx 55/45 T/B) — centering is reasonably close and not severely off. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding on at least two visible corners (upper left and lower left appear softened), consistent with EX to VG-EX range. Surface gloss appears intact with no obvious creases visible in this image, though the photo angle cannot rule out light surface wear. Edges appear reasonably clean with no major nicks visible; rough cut texture is normal for this issue and not penalized. Back cannot be assessed from this photo, widening the range slightly.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (approximately 70/30 left-right), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 55/45 top-bottom), so horizontal centering is the primary concern. All four corners show light-to-moderate rounding — no sharp points are visible, consistent with EX to VG-EX range; no corner is catastrophically soft. Edges appear reasonably clean with no visible nicks or tears, though the top-left corner shows the most wear. Surface gloss appears present but somewhat reduced, with no obvious creases detected from this view; print quality is typical for the 1966 Topps Batman issue with minor color variation acceptable for the era. Back is unseen so no staining, creases, or write-on marks can be ruled out, which is the primary source of uncertainty widening the range down to 4.

