1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat #35B Holy Rodents — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 3 | $5.00 | $9.99 |
| TAG ? | — | — | — |
| PSA 7 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $0.84 | Auction · 2 bids | pending | — | 1966 Topps Batman Series B Set-Break # 35b Holy Rodent VG-VGEX *GMCARDS* on eBay |
![]() | $5.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Series B #35B Holy Rodents "Rodents" on front "Rodent" on back on eBay |
![]() | $9.99 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat Set Card #35B Holy Rodents on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right (roughly 70/30 L-R), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 60/40 T-B) — centering is off but not catastrophically miscut; no adjacent card printing is visible. Corners: all four corners show visible rounding consistent with handling wear — none are sharp, two appear moderately rounded suggesting a VG to VG-EX range. Surface: some gloss loss is apparent and the white border at top shows toning/soiling consistent with age; no obvious crease is visible from this photo but the holder angle and glare prevent a definitive ruling. Edges: appear intact with no major nicks visible, though the rough cut texture normal for this issue is present. The holder obscures fine corner and surface detail; range widened accordingly — a fresh-eyes examination of the back and corners could move this as low as 3 (VG) if a crease is present or as high as 5 (EX) if surface is cleaner than it appears.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (approximately 70/30 L-R), top and bottom borders look more balanced at roughly 60/40 T-B — centering is a concern, leaning toward the OC range. Corners show visible rounding at all four tips, most apparent at the lower-left and upper-right, consistent with an EX to VG-EX range. Edges appear reasonably clean with no gross nicks visible, consistent with normal 1966 Topps rough-cut characteristics that should not be penalized. Surface shows moderate gloss loss and what appears to be light handling wear; no creases are definitively visible from this single photo, but the angle and resolution obscure fine surface flaws. The rough-cut edge texture is normal for the series and not penalized here.
