1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat #3B Hydrofoil Hotspot — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 4 | $5.00 | $32.00 |
| TAG ? | 1 | $11.99 | — |
| PSA 4 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 | 1 | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-15 | $6.01 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman B Series Set-Break # 3B Hydrofoil Hotspot EX-EXMINT |
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $5.00 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Card Blue #3B (Blue Bat Logo) on eBay |
![]() | $6.57 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Topps B Series (Blue Bat Logo) Blue Back Batman Hydrofoil Hotspot #3B 10k8 on eBay |
![]() | $12.10 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | — | BATMAN TRADING CARD 3B 1966 TOPPS BLUE BAT HYDRO-FOIL HOTSPOT on eBay |
![]() | $32.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Series B Blue Bat #3 Hydrofoil Hotspot VG/EX Very Goo ID:67962 on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is reasonably tight and does not appear to be a grade-capping issue. Corners appear mostly sharp with at most very minor softening visible on the lower-left and lower-right corners; no obvious rounding. Edges look clean with no significant nicks or rough cuts beyond normal 1966 Topps production variance. Surface gloss appears intact with no visible creases; some minor print snow is present which is typical for this issue and not penalized heavily. The back is not visible so hidden flaws (creases, staining, writing) cannot be ruled out, which widens the range downward; the strong front presentation supports a 6 EX-MT point estimate.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 55/45 T-B), acceptable but not tight. Corners show light to moderate rounding on at least the visible lower-left corner; upper corners are partially obscured by angle but appear to have some wear. Surface shows mild gloss loss consistent with age and handling, with some light print snow visible in the blue sky area which is normal for this issue. Edges appear reasonably clean with no major tears or significant chips visible; no creases are evident from this photo, though the back cannot be assessed. The toning on the white border areas and overall wear profile suggest a solid EX grade, with VG-EX possible if corner rounding is more pronounced than visible here.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (approx 55/45 L/R), top border appears noticeably wider than bottom (approx 65/35 T/B) — within NM-MT range on the horizontal axis but leaning toward the EX-MT/NM range on vertical. Corners are obscured by the screw-down holder clips and sleeve glare, making precise corner assessment impossible, but no obviously rounded or severely worn corners are visible in the exposed areas. Surface gloss appears intact with no obvious creases visible through the holder; the bright reflection from the screwdown top panel makes surface assessment unreliable. Given vintage print snow is common on this set and is not immediately flagged here, and with no self-disclosed flaws in the title, this card photographs as an EX-MT to NM range specimen, but the holder/sleeve obstruction prevents confident upper-end grading and warrants a widened range.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 70/30 left-right favoring right), top border slightly narrower than bottom (approximately 65/35), so centering is off but not catastrophic. Corners are difficult to assess at this resolution but appear to show some rounding consistent with a VG-EX or VG card — no sharp points visible. Surface shows no obvious creases from this distance, but gloss loss cannot be confirmed or denied. Seller's VG/EX self-assessment seems reasonable; the range is widened due to the distant photo angle making corner and surface detail impossible to assess precisely — a closer scan could push this toward a 5 or drop it to a 3 if hidden creases or more severe corner wear is present.