1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat #5B Caged by the Catwoman — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 4 | $7.84 | $32.00 |
| TAG ? | 3 | $7.04 | $19.99 |
| PSA 8 | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-08 | $3.26 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman Series B Set-Break # 5B Caged by the Catwoman VG-VG |
| 2026-08-15 | $7.84 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman B Series Set-Break # 5B Caged By The Catwoman VG-VG |
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $7.84 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | T.C.G. 1966 Batman B Series (Blue Bat) #5B Caged by the Catwoman Card on eBay |
![]() | $9.00 | Buy It Now | 2 (2–3) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat Logo #5B CAGED BY THE CATWOMAN on eBay |
![]() | $12.99 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Blue Bat Set Card #5B Caged By The Cat-Woman on eBay |
![]() | $32.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Series B Blue Bat #5 Caged by the Catwoman VG/EX Very ID:67964 on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border noticeably thinner than bottom (~40/60 T/B) — centering is passable but not tight. Corners: all four corners show visible rounding, consistent with a VG card; no sharp points remain on any corner. Surface: gloss loss is apparent across the face, with what appears to be light creasing or surface wear in the lower-left quadrant and along the left edge — the card has a 'handled' look throughout. Edges: cuts appear rough but within normal vintage tolerance for 1966 Topps Batman; no trimming suspected. Overall the combination of rounded corners, gloss loss, and probable surface wear/light crease lands this squarely in the VG (3) range, with VG-EX (4) possible if the surface issues are lighter than they appear and GOOD (2) possible if the apparent lower-left crease is confirmed.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~65/35 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is a secondary concern given surface issues. The card shows multiple visible creases across the face, most notably a diagonal crease running through the lower-right quadrant and what appears to be additional stress lines in the upper portion; these are definitive grade-killers. All four corners show rounding consistent with heavy handling wear, and there is clear gloss loss across much of the surface along with edge wear and toning on the white border areas. The card is gradable but the combination of multiple visible creases, rounded corners, and surface wear firmly places this in the Good (2) to VG (3) range, with the crease severity likely anchoring it closer to PSA 2.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (~70/30 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B), so left-right centering is a meaningful concern. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners visible in this angle, consistent with VG-range wear. Surface shows moderate gloss loss and what appears to be general handling wear; the card stock looks slightly dinged with age toning on the white border areas. Edges appear reasonably intact with no obvious major tears, but the overall condition profile — rounded corners, gloss loss, possible light surface wear — lands this squarely in the VG (3) range, with VG-EX (4) possible if corners are better than they appear, and GOOD (2) a floor if there are hidden creases on the reverse.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right (~60/40 left-right favoring right), top border slightly narrower than bottom (~55/45 top-bottom) — centering is off but not severely miscut. Corners appear lightly to moderately rounded, consistent with VG-EX to EX range; no sharp points visible at any corner. Surface shows some gloss loss and the image appears to have light wear consistent with handling; no obvious creases are visible from this photo, though the soft focus and holder obstruction prevent confident crease assessment. The seller's VG/EX self-description aligns reasonably with what is visible; range widened downward to 3 due to inability to confirm crease-free surface, and capped at 5 given visible corner rounding and centering issues.