1966 Topps Batman Red Bat #10A Cycling Crusader — Raw

Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $3.75 | Auction | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Red Bat Card #10A Cycling Crusader |
![]() | $5.42 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman A Series (Red Bat Logo) Cycling Crusader #10A 10k8 |
![]() | $6.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman A Series (Red Bat Logo) Cycling Crusader #10A 1f7d |
![]() | $6.06 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman A Series (Red Bat Logo) Cycling Crusader #10A 0nr3 |
![]() | $6.58 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman A Series (Red Bat Logo) Cycling Crusader #10A 11n6 |
![]() | $8.00 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Red Bat Cycling Crusader #10A |
![]() | $8.88 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman A Series (Red Bat Logo) Cycling Crusader #10A 1n94 |
![]() | $49.99 | Buy It Now | slabbed? | — | 1966 Batman A Series Red Bat #10A Cycling Crusader Graded 6 |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right (~70/30 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B), so horizontal centering is a meaningful concern. All four corners show visible rounding - no sharp points remain on any corner, consistent with a VG or VG-EX range. The white borders show toning/yellowing which is age-appropriate for the set but also indicates handling wear. Surface gloss appears partially intact with some loss visible, and there is what appears to be edge wear/fraying particularly on the left edge. No obvious hard crease is visible from this angle but the angle of the photo cannot rule one out on the back or in the lower portion of the card. The card grades to approximately PSA 3 VG given the rounded corners and border wear, with a realistic range of 2-4 depending on what the back and corners reveal under direct lighting.

Centering estimate: left border appears roughly 10-12% wider than right border (approximately 60/40 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom at roughly 55/45 T/B - centering is acceptable but not tight. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding on at least two visible corners (lower left and lower right appear softened), consistent with EX to VG-EX range. Surface retains reasonable gloss with some light wear visible; no obvious creases detected in this image but the back is unviewable. Edges appear slightly rough but this is normal for 1966 Topps vintage cuts; no miscut detected. Overall impression is a well-loved but presentable copy, most likely grading in the EX (5) range, with VG-EX (4) possible if corner rounding is more severe under loupe, and EX-MT (6) possible if corners hold up better than they appear at this resolution.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~65-70% left / 30-35% right), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) - centering is off but not catastrophic. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners visible in this scan, consistent with VG-EX range. Surface shows some toning/age on the white border areas and slight gloss loss typical of a handled vintage card. No creases are clearly visible from this photo, but the scan resolution limits confidence in detecting light surface creases; the card appears to have honest handling wear consistent with a 4 VG-EX, though it could grade as low as 3 VG if corners are more rounded than they appear or a crease is present on the back.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (~70/30 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B), so horizontal centering is a meaningful concern. Corners show visible rounding on at least the lower-left and upper-left corners visible in the scan, consistent with VG-EX to EX range. Surface shows some gloss loss and what appears to be light toning or wear on the white border areas, particularly along the left edge. No creases are clearly visible from this scan, but the image quality is only fair and the back is unseen; if the back is clean and crease-free, a 4 VG-EX is the most likely outcome, with 5 EX possible if corners are better than they appear and centering measures closer to 80/20.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (approximately 70/30 L/R), top border slightly tighter than bottom (roughly 60/40 T/B) - centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show visible rounding, particularly at the lower-left and lower-right, consistent with a VG-EX to EX range card. Surface shows some gloss loss and what appears to be light wear or handling marks, though the image resolution limits precise assessment of print defects or fine scratches. No creases are clearly visible from this single front photo, but the back is unviewable and the lower portion of the card is partially shadowed, preventing confident assessment of the bottom edge condition; range widened accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border noticeably thinner than bottom (~65/35 T/B) - acceptable for vintage but not tight. Corners: the upper-left corner shows a visible softness/slight rounding; upper-right appears sharper; lower corners are harder to assess at this angle but appear to have minor wear. Surface: gloss is present but appears slightly reduced, no obvious creases visible, minor print artifacts consistent with vintage 1966 Topps production. Edges: appear clean with no major chips or tears, though the rough-cut texture normal for this set is present. Back is not visible so creases or staining cannot be ruled out, widening the range downward; a clean back could support a 6.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~65-70% left bias), top border slightly wider than bottom — approximate L/R ratio ~65/35, T/B ~55/45, which is borderline for NM territory but acceptable for EX-VG-EX range. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (bottom-left and top-left most apparent), consistent with a VG-EX grade. Surface shows some gloss loss and light toning on the white border areas, typical for 57-year-old Topps stock. No creases are clearly visible from this photo, though the image resolution limits confident assessment of fine surface scratches or hidden creases on the back; range widened accordingly.
