1966 Topps Batman Red Bat #12A Boiling Bath

Every grade of this card
| Grade | Live | Asking range | Last confirmed sale | Est. grade (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 11 | $3.50 – $95.00 | $6.00 2026-11-07 | 4.2 |
| TAG ? | 1 | $7.99 | — | 5.0 |
| PSA 2 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 3.5 | 0 | — | — | — |
| CGC 4 | 1 | — | — | — |
| PSA 4 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 5 | 0 | — | — | — |
| CGC 5.5 | 0 | — | — | — |
| GMA 6 | 1 | $24.99 | — | — |
| CGC 6 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 7 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 (OC) | 1 | $125.00 | — | — |
| PSA 8.5 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 9 | 0 | — | — | — |
Confirmed sales — all grades
| Date | Grade | Price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-07 | Raw | $6.00 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-25 | Raw | $2.25 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-15 | Raw | $3.25 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-31 | Raw | $2.25 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-21 | Raw | $0.99 | HIGH |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~65/35 L-R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T-B), so horizontal centering is a meaningful concern but not catastrophic. All four corners show visible rounding and wear — no sharp points remain, consistent with VG to VG-EX range. Edges show roughness and what appears to be chipping or fraying, particularly along the top and left edges; rough cuts are normal for this issue but the degree here suggests genuine handling wear beyond manufacturing variance. Surface gloss appears heavily worn with significant loss across the face, and there is possible light soiling or toning on the white border areas. No crease is definitively confirmed from this photo but cannot be ruled out given the surface wear; the combination of rounded corners, edge wear, and gloss loss anchors this card firmly in the PSA 2–4 range with PSA 3 (VG) as the most likely single grade.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L-R), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at roughly 55/45 T-B — centering is off but not catastrophic. The seller title includes 'READ' which often signals disclosed flaws, and the note at the bottom confirms 'corner wear.' Corner wear is visible even at this resolution, with at least two corners showing rounding consistent with a VG-EX or lower grade. Surface appears to have some spotting or print snow on the costume area, which is period-normal for this issue and should not be heavily penalized. Gloss appears moderate with no obvious creases visible from this angle, but the COMC watermark and image scale limit corner and edge inspection confidence — the range is widened accordingly.

Centering: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border slightly narrower than bottom (roughly 55/45 T-B) — acceptable for the grade range but not tight. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding on at least the visible lower-left and upper-left corners; upper-right appears slightly better but still softened. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible, consistent with the rough-cut norm for this issue. Surface shows some loss of gloss and minor print texture typical of the set; no creases are visible in this photo though the back is unseen and cannot be assessed. Overall condition is consistent with EX (PSA 5) to EX-MT (PSA 6), with corner wear being the primary grade-limiting factor; a VG-EX (PSA 4) floor is retained given the corner softness that is difficult to fully assess from a single seller photo.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (~60% right-heavy), top border slightly larger than bottom, roughly 65/35 L-R and 55/45 T-B — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners visible at this resolution, consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Surface appears to have some gloss loss and possible light soiling or wear across the face, though the COMC watermark obscures the lower-center area making a clean surface read impossible. Edges look reasonably intact with no gross tears evident; no creases are clearly visible but cannot be ruled out under the watermark. The rough cut on the right edge is within normal parameters for this 1966 Topps issue and is not penalized.