1966 Topps Batman Red Bat #15A Gotham Gallants — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 11 | $3.48 | $16.56 |
| CGC 3 | — | — | — |
| PSA 4 | — | — | — |
| CGC 6 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 (OC) | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-21 | $2.47 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman A Series/Red Bat/ - #15A - Gotham Gallants (158) |
| 2026-09-15 | $1.99 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman Series A (Red Bat Logo) #15A Gotham Gallants |
| 2026-08-30 | $11.77 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman A Series (Red Bat Logo) Gotham Gallants #15A READ |
| 2026-08-15 | $8.37 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman A Series Set-Break # 15A Gotham Gallants EX-EXMINT * |
Live listings
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (roughly 70/30 left-right favoring right), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 60/40; horizontal off-centering is the primary concern here. Corners appear to show light rounding consistent with an EX grade — no sharp points visible but no severe blunting either. Edges look reasonably clean with normal vintage rough-cut texture expected for this set. Surface gloss appears present but reduced, with no creases or major print defects visible; however, the display angle and photo resolution limit close inspection of corner tips and surface texture, so a range of VG-EX to EX-MT is appropriate pending back inspection.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (~60/40 L-R favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T-B) — off-center but not severely so for this issue. All four corners show visible rounding/wear, with the bottom-left and bottom-right corners appearing the most fatigued, consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Surface shows some gloss loss and what appears to be light handling wear or toning on the white border areas, though print snow typical of this issue is expected and not penalized. No creases are clearly visible in this image, but the toploader glare obscures fine surface detail especially along the left and top edges, preventing confirmation of a clean surface — the range is widened accordingly. Card edges appear intact with no obvious nicks detectable at this resolution. A raw grade of 4 (VG-EX) is the most probable single estimate given the corner rounding and off-center presentation.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 55/45 T-B) — centering is off but not severely so, within VG-EX range. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (bottom-left most evident), suggesting moderate wear consistent with VG to EX territory. Surface shows some gloss loss and what appears to be light toning/wear across the face, consistent with typical handling for a 58-year-old card; no obvious hard crease is detectable from this photo but cannot be ruled out on the back or in shadowed areas. Edges appear reasonably clean with no gross fraying, consistent with this set's normally rough-cut stock. The photo angle and resolution limit confidence in corner and surface assessment — a tighter scan could push this estimate up or down by one grade.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears noticeably wider than bottom (~65/35 T/B) — centering is off but not severely so. The seller note flags 'edge wear' and 'corner wear,' which is consistent with what the photo shows: corners appear rounded or softened, particularly visible at the lower corners, suggesting rounding consistent with VG-EX to EX range. Surface shows moderate gloss retention with no obvious creases visible from this angle, which is encouraging, but the corner rounding keeps this out of EX-MT (6) territory. Edges show some roughness typical of the 1966 Topps cut but the disclosed 'edge wear' likely means additional chipping or fraying beyond normal vintage texture; without a back view or corner closeups, the range is widened accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 55/45 T-B) — centering is off but not severely so, consistent with EX to EX-MT range. Corners show light rounding on at least the visible lower-left and lower-right, with the upper corners harder to assess at this resolution but appearing similarly softened — no sharp points evident, consistent with EX (5) rather than EX-MT (6). Surface gloss appears intact with no obvious creases visible, and the white border shows mild toning/aging typical of the 1966 issue. No miscut, writing, or staining detected; back is not visible so hidden defects (creases, marks) cannot be ruled out, warranting a widened range.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (~60/40 left-heavy L/R), top and bottom borders look reasonably close (~55/45 T/B) — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners are the primary concern: all four corners show visible rounding, with the upper-left and lower-left appearing most blunted; this is consistent with a VG (3) grade. Surface shows some overall wear and likely gloss reduction, though the single overhead photo makes it difficult to assess sheen precisely. Edges appear moderately worn with some roughness visible along the left side; rough cuts are normal for this issue but additional wear beyond that is evident. No creases are definitively visible in this photo, though the surface texture suggests possible light handling creases that would need confirmation in hand — if no crease is present the card could push to 4, but the corner rounding anchors the estimate firmly in the 3 range.

Centering estimate: left border notably wider than right (approximately 70/30 L-R), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at roughly 55/45 T-B — centering is off but not catastrophically so for this issue. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners visible in this view (lower-left most apparent), consistent with VG to VG-EX wear. Surface appears to retain moderate gloss with no obvious creases detectable from this single-side photo, though the seller's wide grade range (VG+ to NrMT) suggests they may see something on the back; no crease or stain is self-disclosed in the title. Edges look clean with no major nicks; rough cut texture is normal for 1966 Topps Batman and is not penalized. Without a back photo or corner macro shots, the range spans VG (3) to EX (5), with VG-EX (4) the most likely single grade given the corner rounding and left-heavy centering.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (approx 60/40 L/R), top and bottom borders look reasonably balanced at roughly 55/45 T/B — centering is acceptable for EX-MT range. Corners appear to have light wear; at least two corners (top-left and bottom-right) show minor blunting consistent with a 6 EX-MT, though no severe rounding is evident. Surface gloss appears intact with good color saturation and no visible creases, which is consistent with the seller's EX-MT claim. Edges look clean without major nicks; some minor roughness is present but is normal for this 1966 Topps issue. Back is not visible, limiting full assessment; a hidden crease or staining could push the grade lower, hence the range extends to 5.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (approximately 70/30 L/R), top and bottom borders look relatively even at roughly 55/45 T/B — centering is noticeably off horizontally but not severely so. Corners appear lightly worn with what looks like minor rounding on at least the visible corners, consistent with EX to EX-MT range; no sharp gem corners visible but no severe rounding either. Surface gloss appears reasonably intact with no obvious creases or staining visible in this image; the white borders show some minor toning typical of this vintage issue. The seller's EX-MT claim is plausible but the left-right centering tilt and apparent light corner wear suggest a PSA 6 is the most likely outcome, with 5 possible if corners are softer than they appear and 7 if the photo is flattering the centering — back condition cannot be assessed.

