1966 Topps Batman Red Bat #16A Portable Bat Signals — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 11 | $5.72 | $74.99 |
| TAG ? | 1 | $9.91 | — |
| CGC 2.5 | — | — | — |
| PSA 3 | — | — | — |
| PSA 4 | — | — | — |
| CGC 5 | — | — | — |
| PSA 6 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-07 | $7.50 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman Series A Set-Break # 16A Portable Bat Signals LOW GR |
| 2026-10-19 | $8.50 | HIGH · final bid | Portable Bat Signals - 1966 Topps Batman a Series (Red Bat Logo) #16 A |
| 2026-10-04 | $9.50 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman A Series (Red Bat Logo) Portable Bat Signals #16A |
| 2026-09-21 | $8.00 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 TOPPS BATMAN RED BAT CARD # 16A - PORTABLE BAT SIGNALS |
| 2026-09-09 | $11.50 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 TOPPS BATMAN RED BAT CARD # 16A - PORTABLE BAT SIGNALS EX/MT GREA |
| 2026-08-30 | $8.50 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman A Series (Red Bat Logo) Portable Bat Signals #16A |
| 2026-08-20 | $4.25 | HIGH · final bid | Portable Bat Signals 1966 Topps Batman Series A Red Logo #16A |
| 2026-08-15 | $10.50 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman A Series Set-Break # 16A Portable Bat Signals EX-EXM |
Live listings
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 70/30 L/R favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 60/40 T/B) — moderate off-center but not catastrophic. The watermark obscures the center surface, limiting surface assessment. Corner detail is partially visible: upper-left corner shows rounding consistent with VG-range wear; upper-right corner appears similarly soft. Edges appear rough but vintage Topps rough cuts are normal for this issue and not penalized heavily. Surface gloss loss appears evident under the artwork, and there is visible wear/handling throughout; no creases are confirmed from this image but cannot be ruled out given the obscured center. The card grades in the VG to VG-EX range (3–4), with the lower end more likely given apparent corner rounding and surface wear; a crease hiding under the watermark would push this toward a 2.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 55/45 T-B) — centering is acceptable for EX-MT range. The pink/magenta outer border appears intact on all sides with no adjacent card printing visible, so no miscut is evident. Corners show light wear consistent with EX to EX-MT range — no sharp points visible at this resolution but no severe rounding either. Surface gloss appears reasonably retained with no obvious creases, staining, or heavy print defects visible; some minor print texture is normal for this 1966 Topps issue. Back cannot be assessed from this photo, and corner sharpness cannot be confirmed at full magnification, so the range is widened to 5–7 with a point estimate of 6 (EX-MT).

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 70/30 L-R favoring right), top border slightly narrower than bottom (approximately 60/40 T-B) — centering is off but not catastrophically so. More critically, the card surface shows multiple diagonal/vertical crease lines running across the face, most visibly in the upper-left quadrant and mid-card area, which are consistent with handling creases rather than print wrinkles — these alone suppress the grade significantly. Corners appear rounded at all four tips with noticeable softening, consistent with VG to VG-EX range. Gloss appears partially intact in the image center but likely compromised by the creasing; white border shows toning typical of the set. The plastic holder introduces some glare obscuring fine surface detail, and no back is visible, but the front creases are the dominant grade-limiting factor placing this squarely in the VG (3) range with the range widened to account for hidden corner and edge detail.

Centering: left/right borders appear approximately 70/30 favoring left, top/bottom roughly 60/40 favoring top — off-center but within VG-EX range; no miscut detected. The seller's note flags 'surface wear' and 'corner wear,' both of which are consistent with what the photo shows: corners appear rounded/soft at least on the visible lower-right and upper-right, suggesting corner wear consistent with VG to VG-EX (grades 3–4). Gloss appears partially present but dulled in spots, consistent with light surface wear. No visible creases are confirmed from this single front photo, though the watermark obscures the center surface — a crease there cannot be ruled out, which is the primary reason the floor is held at 3. Edges appear reasonably intact with no major chips; rough cut texture is normal for this issue and not penalized.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (~60-65% right-weighted), top border slightly wider than bottom, rough L/R ratio approximately 65/35 to 70/30 — manageable but not ideal. More critically, the card surface shows visible creasing: a horizontal crease or fold line is apparent running across the lower-center portion of the card, which is the primary grade-killer here. All four corners show rounding consistent with handling wear — no sharp points visible, particularly the bottom corners. Edges appear intact with no tears, though the card's rough cut edges are consistent with normal 1966 Topps production and should not be penalized. Gloss appears diminished across the surface. The combination of at least one visible crease and rounded corners lands this card firmly in the VG (3) range, with VG-EX (4) possible if the crease is shallower than it appears and GOOD (2) possible if additional surface damage is hiding in areas obscured by the camera angle.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border notably wider than bottom (~65/35 T/B), which is acceptable for vintage but the bottom tightness needs close inspection. All four corners appear to have only minor wear — no obvious rounding visible at this resolution, but the lower corners are partially obscured by the card's own artwork elements making precise assessment difficult. Surface gloss appears reasonably intact with no obvious creases or staining visible; some minor print texture consistent with normal 1966 Topps production. Edges look clean without significant chipping or fraying, consistent with a mid-to-upper grade card; however, without corner macro shots and a back view, a range of 5–7 is appropriate — the card presents best at EX-MT (6) pending closer inspection.

Centering estimate: left border roughly 10%, right border roughly 15-20%, top border roughly 10%, bottom border roughly 20-25%, yielding approximately 85/15 left-right and 80/20 top-bottom — leaning slightly right-heavy and bottom-heavy but within EX-EX-MT range. Corners appear to have mild rounding, most visible at bottom-right and bottom-left, consistent with EX (5) territory. Surface shows reasonable gloss retention with no obvious creases visible from this angle, though the seller's 'hg6' notation suggests they see something consistent with EX-MT. Edges appear clean with no alarming chipping; rough cut texture is normal for this vintage Topps issue and is not penalized. Cannot assess the back for staining, creases, or write marks, which widens the range downward.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 55/45 T-B) — centering is off but within EX-MT range on the horizontal axis. Corners show light wear visible at the lower-left and lower-right, consistent with a 5-6 grade; upper corners appear slightly sharper but still show mild rounding. Surface gloss appears reasonably intact with no obvious creases visible from this photo, and no significant print defects or staining noted on the white border. Edges appear clean with the rough cut typical of 1966 Topps Batman production — not penalized. The seller's self-designated 'hg6' aligns with this assessment; without corner macro shots or a back view, a range of 5-7 is appropriate.


