1966 Topps Batman Red Bat #31A Flying Foes

Every grade of this card
| Grade | Live | Asking range | Last confirmed sale | Est. grade (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 12 | $3.41 – $29.29 | $5.50 2026-11-08 | 4.5 |
| PSA 2 | 0 | — | — | — |
| CGC 3.5 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 4 | 1 | — | — | — |
| CGC 5 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 6 | 0 | — | $104.50 2026-10-21 | — |
| PSA 9 (OC) | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 9 | 0 | — | $224.50 2026-10-26 | — |
Confirmed sales — all grades
| Date | Grade | Price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-08 | Raw | $5.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-11-04 | Raw | $7.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-10-26 | PSA 9 | $224.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-10-21 | PSA 6 | $104.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-10-03 | Raw | $6.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-20 | Raw | $1.25 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-15 | Raw | $1.99 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-15 | Raw | $8.50 | HIGH |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top and bottom borders look close to 55/45 — centering is acceptable for EX-MT range. Corners show mild rounding at two or three corners visible from this distance, consistent with light use; no corner is sharply crisp but none appears heavily blunted. Surface gloss appears present with no obvious creases or staining visible; print quality looks typical for the 1966 issue with no alarming snow or color breaks noted. Back cannot be assessed from this photo, and corner detail is limited at this zoom level, so the range is widened accordingly — a closer inspection could push the grade up toward 7 NM or confirm light wear holding it at 5-6.

MISCUT CONFIRMED: The right edge shows a distinct white strip of an adjacent card's unprinted border bleeding into this card's right side — this is a production miscut, not just off-centering. Centering estimate: left border ~2mm, right border ~8-10mm (extremely off, roughly 85/15 L/R); top border obscured by label but appears thin; bottom border moderate. This miscut effectively caps the grade in the PSA 1-3 range regardless of surface condition. Surface gloss appears partially intact through the sleeve but there is visible toning on the white borders and the card shows age-consistent wear. Corners cannot be assessed precisely through the toploader glare but appear rounded based on visible softness at lower corners. Error/miscut cards have a dedicated collector market and should be marketed as such — PSA does grade miscuts but qualifies them 'MC' (miscut) and the numeric grade reflects overall condition within that context, likely landing PSA 1-2 due to the severity of the cut shift.

Centering estimate: left border ~6mm, right border ~4mm, top border ~5mm, bottom border ~5mm — approximately 60/40 left-to-right and 50/50 top-to-bottom, which is acceptable for vintage but the left-right shift is notable. Corners: the upper-left and lower-right corners appear to show light rounding/wear; the upper-right corner looks slightly blunted as well, consistent with EX to EX-MT range. Surface and gloss appear reasonably intact with no obvious creases visible in this photo, though some minor print snow is present which is normal for this issue. Cannot assess the back for staining or paper quality, and corner closeups are not available, so the range is widened accordingly — a hidden crease or more significant corner wear on the back could push this toward a 4.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border noticeably wider than bottom (~65/35 T/B), which is acceptable for this set but slightly off. Corners show light to moderate rounding — the upper-left and lower-right corners appear softer than the upper-right, which looks relatively sharp; no corner is crisp enough for NM territory. Edges appear reasonably clean with the rough-cut texture typical of 1966 Topps Batman (not penalized). Surface shows moderate gloss retention with some light wear; no creases are visible in this image, but the back cannot be assessed. The overall presentation is consistent with EX (5) range, with a floor of VG-EX (4) if back-side issues or corner rounding is worse than visible here.