1966 Topps Batman Red Bat #36A Cliff Hangers

Every grade of this card
| Grade | Live | Asking range | Last confirmed sale | Est. grade (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 14 | $3.39 – $11.74 | $3.51 2026-11-07 | 4.8 |
| TAG ? | 3 | $1.25 – $19.99 | — | 4.5 |
| PSA 1 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 3 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 3.5 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 4 | 0 | — | — | — |
| CGC 5 | 0 | — | $27.00 2026-09-22 | — |
| PSA 7 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 (OC) | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 | 0 | — | $86.00 2026-10-26 | — |
Confirmed sales — all grades
| Date | Grade | Price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-07 | Raw | $3.51 | HIGH |
| 2026-10-26 | PSA 8 | $86.00 | HIGH |
| 2026-10-15 | Raw | $3.25 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-22 | CGC 5 | $27.00 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-11 | Raw | $5.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-01 | Raw | $9.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-15 | Raw | $7.50 | HIGH |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~60/40 L/R), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is within EX-MT to NM range and is not a significant deduction. Corners: upper-left and upper-right corners appear reasonably sharp with only slight wear visible; lower corners are partially obscured by the card stand but show no obvious rounding from what is visible. Surface: gloss appears reasonably intact with no visible creases; there is a possible light toning spot or soil near the upper-right corner area of the white border that warrants attention. Edges: the cut appears typical of 1966 Topps rough-cut production norms and is not penalized; no adjacent card printing is visible indicating no miscut. Overall the card presents solidly in the EX-MT (6) range with potential to reach NM (7) if corners and back are clean, but the partially obscured lower half and single angle prevent a confident upper-end call.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L/R), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 55/45 T/B — centering is slightly off but within EX-MT range. Corners: at this resolution all four corners appear reasonably sharp with only minor blunting visible; no obvious rounding that would push below EX. Surface: gloss appears present and image is clean with no visible creases or staining; the COMC watermark obscures the center of the card face preventing full surface assessment. Edges appear consistent with a vintage 1966 Topps rough cut — no alarming fraying visible. Back is unavailable; range is widened accordingly to account for hidden corner wear or surface issues.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (~60% left / 40% right L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — modest but not severe miscentering, consistent with a 6-7 on centering alone. Corners: all four corners show visible rounding under the angle of this photo; no sharp points are evident, suggesting wear in the VG-EX to EX range. Surface: gloss appears reduced with some light scuffing or surface wear visible across the face; no obvious hard creases are apparent from this view, though the photo angle and lighting could conceal shallow ones. Edges: appear slightly rough but within normal 1966 Topps cut tolerance; no major nicks visible. The combination of rounded corners and reduced gloss places this most likely at PSA 4 (VG-EX), with the range extending to 3 if a hidden crease exists or to 5 if corners are slightly better than they appear under this lighting.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border narrower than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable, not severe. The seller's note and the bottom caption both flag 'corner wear, surface scratches, and surface impressions,' which is consistent with visible rounding at the corners detectable even at this resolution; at least two corners (upper-left and lower-left) show softening. Surface scratches and impressions are seller-disclosed and partially visible as whitish streaks/scuffs across the card face, which would drag the grade below EX-MT (6). No creases are clearly visible, which keeps this out of VG (3) territory; the overall presentation looks closer to VG-EX (4) to EX (5). The COMC watermark obscures center surface detail, limiting certainty on surface condition depth.