1966 Topps Batman Red Bat #37A Watery Warfare

Every grade of this card
| Grade | Live | Asking range | Last confirmed sale | Est. grade (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 12 | $2.25 – $9.99 | $7.50 2026-09-12 | 4.2 |
| TAG ? | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 4 | 1 | $79.99 | — | — |
| PSA 5 | 1 | $27.99 | — | — |
| CGC 6 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 6 | 1 | $61.50 | — | — |
| PSA 7 | 0 | — | — | — |
| SGC 7 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 | 1 | $195.00 | — | — |
| Auto / Authentic | 1 | $1,499.99 | — | — |
Confirmed sales — all grades
| Date | Grade | Price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-12 | Raw | $7.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-31 | Raw | $10.01 | HIGH |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 55/45 T-B) — centering is off but not severely so, likely within EX-MT range on that axis alone. Corners: upper-left corner shows the most visible wear with some rounding; upper-right and lower corners appear slightly soft but not heavily rounded — consistent with EX to EX-MT range. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible at this resolution; rough cut texture on left edge is normal for this issue and not penalized. Surface gloss appears moderate with some light wear or scuffing visible across the card face reducing gloss somewhat, no creases detected in this image though the back is unseen. Overall condition supports a PSA 5 EX point estimate, with 4 possible if corner wear is worse than it appears and 6 possible if the surface holds up better under direct inspection.

Centering: left border appears narrower than right (~60% of right border width), top border slightly narrower than bottom — estimated L/R roughly 55/45 and T/B roughly 55/45, so centering is modest but not severely off. The more pressing concern is corner condition: all four corners show visible rounding and softening, consistent with a VG-EX to EX range card. Surface gloss appears partially present but shows wear and some light scuffing visible across the face. Edges look reasonably intact with no obvious tears or chips, which is consistent for the 1966 Topps rough-cut stock. No creases are clearly visible in this photo, but the card shows enough overall wear to suggest a grade in the 4–5 range; the rounded corners prevent anything higher, and the absence of visible creases keeps it out of the 3 range unless the back reveals otherwise.

Centering estimate: left border ~6mm, right border ~4mm, top border ~5mm, bottom border ~4mm — left/right approximately 60/40, top/bottom approximately 55/45, centering is acceptable but slightly left-heavy. Corners: all four corners show visible rounding/softness, particularly the lower-left and upper-right, which push this below EX-MT territory. Edges appear slightly rough but this is consistent with normal 1966 Topps rough-cut production and should not be over-penalized. Surface shows modest gloss loss across the face with some light toning on the white border, consistent with age; no creases are visible in this photo but the back cannot be confirmed. The combination of rounded corners and gloss loss places this comfortably in VG-EX to EX range (PSA 4–5), with a point estimate of 4 pending back inspection.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears noticeably narrower than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is passable but not tight. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners visible in this image (upper-left and lower-left appear softened), consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Surface shows some overall toning/aging typical of the set; no obvious hard creases are detectable but the COMC watermark obscures a significant portion of the card face making surface condition difficult to confirm. Edges appear reasonably clean with no severe nicks visible. The wide range reflects uncertainty introduced by the watermark obstruction — a clean scan or physical inspection would be needed to confirm surface and corner condition more precisely.