1966 Topps Batman Red Bat #3A The Menacing Mummy

Every grade of this card
| Grade | Live | Asking range | Last confirmed sale | Est. grade (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 16 | $3.42 – $25.00 | $8.00 2026-11-07 | 4.6 |
| TAG ? | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 2.5 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 3.5 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 5 | 0 | — | — | — |
| CGC 7 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 9 | 0 | — | $224.50 2026-10-26 | — |
Confirmed sales — all grades
| Date | Grade | Price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-07 | Raw | $8.00 | HIGH |
| 2026-11-04 | Raw | $2.00 | HIGH |
| 2026-10-26 | PSA 9 | $224.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-10-15 | Raw | $1.99 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-15 | Raw | $4.99 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-15 | Raw | $1.99 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-11 | Raw | $3.00 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-06 | Raw | $9.49 | HIGH |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55-60% left bias), top border appears moderately wider than bottom, rough call of approximately 60/40 L/R and 65/35 T/B - centering is off but not severely so. Corners: at this resolution all four corners show some degree of rounding/wear; no sharp razor corners are evident, consistent with EX to VG-EX range. Surface/gloss: the card appears to retain moderate gloss with no immediately obvious heavy creasing, but the angle and image quality make it difficult to rule out light surface creases or subtle wear; no writing or staining visible. Edges appear reasonably clean for a vintage 1966 Topps issue. The seller's NRMT claim appears optimistic based on visible corner wear and centering; EX (5) is the most likely grade, with EX-MT (6) possible if corners are sharper than they appear and VG-EX (4) possible if closer inspection reveals additional wear.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (approximately 60/40 L/R favoring right), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 55/45 T/B) — centering is acceptable for EX range but not mint-grade territory. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding on all four, most visible at the lower-left and upper-left, consistent with EX to VG-EX wear. Edges appear reasonably clean with no dramatic fraying, though the rough-cut texture normal to this issue is present. Surface gloss appears partially intact with some dulling visible, no creases are evident in this photo but back cannot be assessed; the card reads as a solid EX (5) candidate with VG-EX (4) possible if corner rounding is more pronounced than the photo reveals and EX-MT (6) as an outside ceiling if corners are sharper than they appear at this resolution.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is reasonably tight and not a significant grade detractor. Corners: all four corners appear reasonably sharp at this resolution; no obvious rounding visible on the front-facing corners, though the lower-left and upper-left corners show slight softening that may indicate light wear — consistent with EX-MT to NM range. Edges appear clean with no obvious nicks or rough tears beyond normal 1966 Topps production variation. Surface shows good gloss retention with no visible creases; print quality looks clean with no heavy snow or major print defects apparent, though fine surface wear cannot be ruled out without a higher-resolution or back-side image. The back is not visible, limiting confidence; a conservative EX-MT (6) point estimate reflects the apparent light corner wear with the possibility of NM (7) if corners hold up under closer inspection.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is reasonably close but not tight. Corners show light rounding on at least two visible corners (upper-left and lower-left appear softened), consistent with EX to VG-EX range. Edges appear relatively clean with no egregious chipping visible, normal for the vintage rough-cut stock of this issue. Surface shows acceptable gloss for the era with no obvious creases visible in this single front image, though the watermark overlay obscures the center — a crease beneath it cannot be ruled out, widening the range downward; back and corner closeups would tighten the estimate considerably.