1966 Topps Batman Red Bat #43A Menace in Fairyland

Every grade of this card
| Grade | Live | Asking range | Last confirmed sale | Est. grade (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 17 | $3.00 – $20.00 | $3.00 2026-10-04 | 4.8 |
| TAG ? | 1 | $7.99 | — | 5.0 |
| PSA 4 | 1 | — | — | — |
| CGC 5 | 0 | — | — | — |
| CGC 5.5 | 1 | $34.99 | — | — |
| BGS 6 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 6 | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 8 (OC) | 1 | $87.89 | — | — |
| KSA 8.5 | 1 | $89.00 | — | — |
| Auto / Authentic | 0 | — | — | — |
Confirmed sales — all grades
| Date | Grade | Price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-04 | Raw | $3.00 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-16 | Raw | $5.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-15 | Raw | $1.99 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-11 | Raw | $2.25 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-04 | Raw | $4.00 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-30 | Raw | $4.25 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-20 | Raw | $5.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-19 | Raw | $2.29 | HIGH |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top and bottom borders look reasonably even at approximately 55/45 — centering is acceptable for NM range but not tight enough for 8+. Corners appear fairly sharp with only minimal softening visible at the upper-left and lower-right; no obvious rounding or creasing detected. Surface gloss looks largely intact with good color saturation and no visible scratches or print defects beyond normal 1966 Topps print texture. Edges appear clean with no fraying evident, consistent with the rough-cut norm of this issue. The seller's 'NM' claim is plausible but without corner macro shots or a back view, a range of EX-MT to NM-MT is most defensible; the slight left-right centering imbalance is the primary grade limiter here.

Centering estimate: left border ~35%, right border ~65% left-to-right — noticeably right-heavy, approximating 65/35 L/R; top border appears slightly wider than bottom, roughly 55/45 T/B, so top-to-bottom centering is acceptable. Corners appear to show light-to-moderate rounding, consistent with EX-MT to NM range; no corner is visibly sharp enough for a clean 7 call. Surface gloss appears reasonable with good color saturation, no visible creases detected in this photo, but the COMC watermark partially obscures the mid-card surface making crease detection unreliable. Edges look clean with no major fraying visible. The left-right centering issue is the primary grade limiter here; absent any hidden surface defects on the back or closer corner inspection, EX-MT (6) feels most appropriate, with NM (7) possible if corners are sharper than they appear at this resolution.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right (~60% of right border width), top border appears slightly narrower than bottom — approximate L/R ~65/35, T/B ~55/45, putting this in EX-MT or worse centering territory on the horizontal axis. Corner inspection at this resolution shows visible rounding on at least the lower-left and upper-left corners; the other two are partially obscured by angle but show softness. Surface shows moderate gloss loss with some toning on the white border consistent with age; there is apparent wear and possible light creasing though definitive crease confirmation requires back-side or higher-resolution imagery. Overall condition presentation is consistent with a VG (3) grade, with the range spanning GOOD (2) to VG-EX (4) depending on what the reverse and corner closeups reveal.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (approximately 70/30 left-right favoring right), top and bottom borders look closer to 55/45 — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding on at least the visible lower corners; the upper corners are harder to assess at this distance but appear slightly soft as well, suggesting EX to VG-EX range. Surface shows no obvious creasing visible from this angle, gloss appears moderate with some expected age-related loss consistent with a raw 1966 card. Edges look reasonably clean with no major nicks evident, though the rough-cut character normal for this issue makes edge assessment difficult from a single seller photo — back condition and corner macro shots are unavailable, widening the range.