1966 Topps Batman Red Bat #4A Target of the Trapper

Every grade of this card
| Grade | Live | Asking range | Last confirmed sale | Est. grade (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 19 | $1.99 – $55.00 | $1.99 2026-09-15 | 4.6 |
| TAG ? | 1 | $10.69 | — | 5.0 |
| BVG 3 | 1 | $78.21 | — | — |
| PSA 3 | 0 | — | — | — |
| CGC 5 | 1 | $44.99 | — | — |
| PSA 6 | 2 | $60.00 – $61.50 | — | — |
| PSA 7 | 1 | $180.56 | — | — |
| PSA 8 | 0 | — | — | — |
Confirmed sales — all grades
| Date | Grade | Price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-15 | Raw | $1.99 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-11 | Raw | $7.50 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-11 | Raw | $2.00 | HIGH |
| 2026-09-06 | Raw | $6.99 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-31 | Raw | $10.00 | HIGH |
| 2026-08-06 | Raw | $3.00 | HIGH |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right (approximately 70/30 left-to-right), top and bottom borders look closer to 55/45 — centering is off horizontally but not catastrophically so for this set. Corners appear reasonably sharp at this resolution with no obvious rounding visible on the top-left or bottom-left corners; the right-side corners are harder to assess given the angle but show no glaring wear. The white border shows minor toning consistent with vintage storage, which is typical for this issue and not heavily penalized. Surface gloss appears intact with no visible creases, staining, or print defects beyond minor print texture normal for 1966 Topps; the seller's 'NrMt' claim seems plausible but the left-to-right centering tilt is the primary limiting factor, keeping the ceiling below 8 without corner closeups to confirm sharpness.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 left-right), top border slightly wider than bottom (approximately 60/40 top-bottom) — centering is off but not catastrophically so for this series. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners visible in the photo (lower-left and upper-left), consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Surface shows moderate gloss loss and what appears to be light handling wear; no obvious hard crease is visible from this angle though one cannot be ruled out on the back or in areas obscured by the camera angle. Edges appear slightly rough but within normal vintage cut tolerance for this 1966 Topps issue; the overall card presents as well-loved raw vintage material, most likely landing in the VG-EX (4) neighborhood with EX (5) possible if corners are better than they appear and no hidden crease exists.

Centering: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R favoring right), top border slightly narrower than bottom (approximately 55/45 T-B) — centering is imperfect but within EX-MT range on at least one axis. Corners: all four corners show light rounding consistent with handling wear; no corners appear sharp under this resolution, suggesting EX to VG-EX territory. Surface: some gloss loss is visible, particularly in the upper field; the card stock appears toned/aged as expected for a 58-year-old card, and minor print grain is present but no obvious creases are detectable from this single-image view. Edges appear reasonably clean with no major nicks visible, though the rough-cut texture normal for this issue is present; back is not shown so hidden creases or staining cannot be ruled out, widening the range conservatively downward.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably thinner than right (roughly 70/30 L-R), top border slightly thinner than bottom (approximately 65/35 T-B), placing centering in the VG-EX to EX range at best. Corners: the upper-left corner shows visible rounding/wear; upper-right appears to have a small nick or bend; lower corners are harder to assess but suggest moderate wear consistent with a VG-EX grade. Surface: gloss appears partially intact but with some overall wear and light toning on the white border areas typical of this set's age; no obvious hard creases visible from this angle but the surface is not clean enough to rule out light stress lines. The back is not visible so staining, creases, or writing cannot be ruled out — range is widened accordingly; a back with issues could push this toward a 3.