1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #13 A Dual Decision

Every grade of this card
| Grade | Live | Asking range | Last confirmed sale | Est. grade (ours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 7 | $8.88 – $20.00 | $9.50 2026-09-06 | 3.8 |
| TAG ? | 0 | — | — | — |
| PSA 6.5 | 1 | $120.00 | — | — |
| PSA 7 | 1 | $99.00 | — | — |
| PSA 8 (ST) | 1 | $107.89 | — | — |
Confirmed sales — all grades
| Date | Grade | Price | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-06 | Raw | $9.50 | HIGH |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R acceptable), top border visibly narrower than bottom (~60/40 T/B), so centering is reasonable but not tight. All four corners show visible rounding/blunting — no sharp points are apparent on any corner, suggesting wear consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Surface shows some gloss loss and what appears to be light soiling or toning on the black border areas; no crease is clearly visible from this angle but the card body has a slightly soft look that could hide a light surface crease. Edges appear intact with no major nicks noted, consistent with normal vintage handling for this 1966 issue. The angled single-photo view prevents confident corner and back assessment, warranting a widened range of 3–5.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 60/40 L-R), top and bottom borders appear relatively even at approximately 55/45 T-B — centering is passable but not tight. The COMC watermark obscures the center of the image, preventing full surface assessment. Corners appear to show light rounding at all four, consistent with an EX range card; no corner is obviously blunted or frayed from this distance but no corner is razor-sharp either. Edges look reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible, consistent with typical rough 1966 Topps cuts which should not be penalized. Gloss and surface condition cannot be reliably assessed due to the watermark obstruction and the compressed eBay thumbnail resolution — a wider range than normal is warranted, and a closer corner/edge photo would help significantly narrow this estimate.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (roughly 55/45 L/R), top border appears moderately wider than bottom (roughly 60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable for a VG-EX range. Corners cannot be assessed with precision at this shooting distance, but the card appears to show some rounding at the corners consistent with handling wear; no corners appear sharp enough for EX-MT or above. The card shows a visible crease or fold line running diagonally across the upper portion of the card (visible as a light line near the top center), which is a meaningful surface defect that anchors the grade toward VG-EX (4) or VG (3) territory. Surface gloss appears moderate with some loss evident. The seller's VG/EX self-assessment is plausible; the apparent crease is the primary grade-limiting factor here, and without a closer corner shot or back image the range cannot be tightened further.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 70/30 L-R), top and bottom borders look close to 55/45 — horizontal off-centering is the primary concern. All four corners show visible rounding and wear, consistent with a VG to VG-EX card; no corner is sharp. Surface shows scattered scuffs and handling marks visible even through the sleeve, with some gloss loss across the face. No obvious hard creases are visible from this photo, though the sleeve glare obscures fine surface detail on the lower half of the card; if a crease is hiding under the glare the grade could push toward the low end of this range.