1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #16 Hide-and-Go-Riddle — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 7 | $5.43 | $13.50 |
| TAG ? | 3 | $2.09 | $2.79 |
| SGC 6 | 1 | $85.00 | — |
| PSA 6 | 1 | — | — |
| PSA 7 (ST) | 1 | $87.89 | — |
| PSA 7 | 1 | $72.99 | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $5.43 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back Hide-And-Go-Riddle #16 16ez on eBay |
![]() | $8.29 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–7) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back Hide-And-Go-Riddle #16 1nf5 on eBay |
![]() | $9.00 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | TOPPS 1966 BATMAN Card #16 "HIDE-AND-GO-RIDDLE" Ex Condition/Riddler Back on eBay |
![]() | $10.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #16 Hide-and-Go-Riddle on eBay |
![]() | $12.00 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | — | 1966 Batman Riddler Back #16 Hide And Go Riddle NRMINT Nice Corners on eBay |
![]() | $12.00 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | — | 1966 Batman Riddler Back Card 16 Hide-And-Go-Riddle Stunning NRMINT High Grade on eBay |
![]() | $13.50 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 TOPPS BATMAN ROBIN HIDE-AND-GO-RIDDLE RIDDLER #16 EX/NM+ CREASE FREE CLEAN on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (approx 55/45 L/R), top border appears noticeably wider than bottom (approx 65/35 T/B) — centering is off but not severely so. The COMC watermark obscures the lower-center surface, making surface condition and lower corner assessment difficult. The visible upper corners appear to show some rounding or soft wear, consistent with a VG-EX range card. Edges appear reasonably intact with no obvious major chipping visible, though the rough cut typical of 1966 Topps Batman is present. Gloss appears moderate with some loss evident; no obvious creases are visible from this photo, but the watermark occlusion and FAIR image quality prevent confident assessment of the surface and all four corners, warranting a wide range.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering looks acceptable in the 65/35 range at worst, not an obvious OC issue. The COMC watermark obscures the card center and prevents confident surface assessment. Corners appear to show some rounding or slight wear — none look razor-sharp, consistent with a card in the EX to NM range, but fine detail is blocked by the overlay. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious tears or significant chips visible. Gloss and print quality appear decent from what is visible, but the watermark makes a confident surface call impossible; range is widened accordingly to reflect this uncertainty.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right by a moderate margin, roughly 60-65% right-heavy L/R; top border appears slightly wider than bottom, perhaps 55/45 T/B — centering is off but not extreme, consistent with EX-range tolerance. Corners are partially obscured by sleeve glare and toploader edges, but no obviously mashed or heavily rounded corners are visible; they appear lightly worn at best, suggesting EX to EX-MT range. Surface gloss appears present but the photo compression and glare make it impossible to confirm absence of creases or print defects — the seller's 'EX' self-assessment is taken at face value and is consistent with visual evidence. Back cannot be assessed; no miscut indicators seen, but one-photo limitations and sleeve obstruction prevent a tighter range than 4–6.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (roughly 55/45 L/R), top border notably thinner than bottom (roughly 40/60 T/B), so top-heavy misalignment is the primary centering concern but not severe enough to flag as miscut. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (top-left and bottom-right most apparent), consistent with moderate handling wear placing this in the VG-EX to EX range. Surface shows some gloss loss and what appears to be light wear or soiling; no obvious hard creases are visible from this photo but the image resolution and angle limit confidence — a back-side crease or hidden surface crease cannot be ruled out. Edges appear reasonably intact with no major nicks visible, which is typical for this set's somewhat rough-cut stock. Overall impression is VG-EX (4) with EX (5) as a ceiling if corners are better than they appear, and VG (3) as a floor if surface or hidden flaws are worse.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border slightly narrower than bottom (~55/45 T/B) — centering is reasonably tight and not a significant deduction. Corners appear mostly sharp with minimal rounding visible on the two near corners; the lower-left corner looks the softest but not severely rounded — consistent with the seller's NM claim. Surface gloss appears present with good color saturation, no visible creases, and print quality looks clean for a 1966 Topps issue. The card shows a noticeable curl/bow which may indicate prior humidity exposure and could mask subtle surface issues; back condition and corner sharpness under magnification are unknown, so the range is widened accordingly — a PSA 6 EX-MT is the most likely landing spot.

Centering estimate: left/right borders appear approximately 55/45 to 60/40 — reasonably well centered horizontally; top/bottom appears roughly 55/45, acceptable for vintage. Corners: the four corners show some light wear visible even at this resolution — the lower-left corner appears slightly soft/blunted, and the upper-left shows minor rounding; the right-side corners look somewhat sharper but not razor-crisp. Surface appears to retain decent gloss with no obvious creases or major print defects visible; some minor print snow or grain is expected for this issue and not penalizing. Edges look clean with no major nicks visible. Cannot assess the back, and corner sharpness at macro level is uncertain from this single photo — range reflects NM-MT potential if corners hold up under close inspection, sliding to EX if corner wear is more pronounced than it appears.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (~55-60% right-heavy), top and bottom borders look roughly 55/45 top-heavy — centering is off but not catastrophically so, likely in the 75/25 to 80/20 range on the tighter axis, consistent with EX to EX-MT territory. The scan shows notable chromatic aberration (red/blue channel misalignment) which makes precise corner and surface assessment difficult, but corners appear to have light-to-moderate rounding rather than sharp points, consistent with EX (5) rather than NM (7+). No creases are visible from this image, supporting the seller's 'crease free' claim. Gloss appears present but cannot be fully assessed due to scan quality; surface shows no obvious staining or major print defects beyond normal 1966 Topps print snow. The rough card edges are normal for this issue and are not penalized.