1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #19 A Purr-Fect Plot — Raw

Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $4.00 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Card (R710-16f) #19, VERY NICE CARD!!! NO CREASES !! |
![]() | $6.58 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back A Purr-fect Plot #19 16ez |
![]() | $6.99 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 Topps Batman/Riddler Back - #19 - A Purr-Fect Plot - Catwoman/Joker (151) |
![]() | $8.99 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 Topps Batman/Riddler Back - #19 - A Purr-Fect Plot - Catwoman/Joker (77) |
![]() | $12.00 | Buy It Now | 6 (5–7) | — | 1966 Batman Riddler Back Card 19 A Purr-Fect Plot Stunning NRMINT High Grade |
![]() | $18.08 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–7) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back A Purr-fect Plot #19 06mi |
![]() | $19.99 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Backs #19 Purr-Fect Plot Netherlands Holland |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 65-70% left-heavy), top border slightly wider than bottom, suggesting approximately 65/35 L/R and 60/40 T/B — centering is off but not extreme. Most critically, there is a prominent diagonal crease or fold line visible running across the upper portion of the card (upper-left to center area), which is a significant surface defect despite the seller claiming 'NO CREASES' — this crease alone caps the grade in the VG range or below. The card also shows visible wear along the top edge and corners appear rounded/soft, consistent with heavy handling. The photo angle and resolution prevent confident assessment of gloss loss and all four corners, widening the range considerably, but the visible crease and corner wear point strongly to a VG (3) grade.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~65/35 L/R), top and bottom borders look roughly 55/45 T/B — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners: all four corners show visible rounding, consistent with a VG-range card; no sharp points remain. Edges appear somewhat rough but rough cuts are normal for 1966 Topps Batman. Surface shows noticeable gloss loss across the image area and the borders show some toning/yellowing typical of the vintage. No obvious hard crease is visible in this photo but the overall wear pattern (corner rounding plus gloss loss) places this firmly in the VG (3) range, with a VG-EX (4) ceiling if the back is clean and no crease is present, and a GOOD (2) floor if a crease is hiding on the back or underside.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~65/35 L/R), top and bottom borders look relatively even (~55/45 T/B), so centering is off but not catastrophically so. The top-left and bottom-left corners show visible rounding and wear; the right-side corners are harder to assess but appear similarly worn. The black border on the top edge shows significant wear/chipping and the card has an overall soft, aged look with gloss loss evident across the surface. There appears to be a slight bend or handling crease near the upper portion of the card, consistent with the well-worn presentation. This is a well-loved vintage card that shows honest play wear throughout; a PSA 3 VG is the most likely outcome, with 4 VG-EX possible if the crease impression is shallower than it appears and corners grade better in hand.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (approximately 70/30 L/R), top border slightly wider than bottom (roughly 60/40 T/B), so centering is off but not catastrophic. The corners are the primary concern — all four show visible rounding, consistent with heavy handling, with the top-left and bottom-left corners appearing the most worn. The black border along the top edge shows chipping and wear, and there is evident gloss loss across the surface. A light surface crease or surface wear appears present in the lower-left quadrant, though the image resolution makes it difficult to confirm a hard crease definitively. Overall condition profile aligns with VG (3), with the rounded corners, gloss loss, and possible surface crease; could drop to 2 if the crease is confirmed on inspection, or reach 4 if the surface distress is lighter than it appears.

Centering estimated at approximately 65/35 left-to-right and 60/40 top-to-bottom — borders are reasonably balanced but slightly tighter on the right and bottom edges, consistent with NM-MT to NM range on centering alone. Corners appear to show very light wear on at least two corners (bottom-left and top-right appear slightly soft), not razor sharp but not rounded, consistent with EX-MT to NM territory. Surface gloss appears intact with no obvious creases visible, and print quality looks clean for a 1966 Topps issue with no notable print snow visible at this resolution. The back of the card is not visible so the Riddler-back condition cannot be confirmed, and corner sharpness cannot be fully assessed without a closer crop, widening the range slightly downward.

The CoMC watermark significantly obscures the center of the card, making surface condition assessment difficult. Border estimation: left border appears slightly wider than right (~60/40 L/R), top and bottom borders appear relatively even (~55/45 T/B) - centering is passable but not exceptional. The card frame/border appears intact with no obvious miscut. Corners are not clearly visible at this resolution through the watermark obstruction, though the card does not appear heavily worn. No obvious creases are detectable but the watermark prevents confident surface evaluation - range is wide due to the obstruction hiding critical grading details that would normally differentiate a 4 from a 7.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R); top border noticeably thinner than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — not severely off-center but not tight either. Corners show visible rounding/softening on at least two corners (upper-left and lower-right appear most worn), consistent with EX range. Surface gloss appears partially intact with some loss visible — no obvious creases can be confirmed from this photo but the resolution is insufficient to rule out light surface creases. Edges appear reasonably intact with typical vintage rough-cut texture normal for this set; no writing or staining visible. The seller's 'Netherlands Holland' notation may indicate a non-Topps (possibly A&BC or European) printing variant — if so, this could affect set identity and grading context, but image alone cannot confirm print origin definitively.
Same card, other grades
PSA 7 (2)