1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #20 Attacked — Raw

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~65/35 L/R); top and bottom borders appear roughly 55/45 T/B - centering is off but not severely miscut. All four corners show visible rounding, most notably the lower-left and upper-right, consistent with a VG card. The black border shows edge wear and fraying, particularly along the right edge and lower-left corner. Surface gloss appears significantly reduced with some cloudiness/scuffing visible in the photo; the image itself is somewhat faded/washed, which is typical of the print era but gloss loss is evident. No obvious hard creases are visible in this photo though the lower portion of the card is shadowed, making a definitive crease assessment difficult - seller's VG call of ~PSA 3 appears reasonable, with the worn corners and edge wear being the primary grade drivers.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (roughly 70/30 left-right favoring right), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at roughly 60/40; centering is off but not catastrophic. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners visible in the photo, consistent with VG to VG-EX range. Surface shows some general wear and likely gloss loss though hard to confirm fully in this lighting; no obvious creases are visible from this single front photo, though the seller's VG+ claim (approximately PSA 4) aligns with what is visible. Edges appear intact with no major chipping. The black borders on 1966 Topps Batman mask edge wear somewhat, which is a known characteristic of this set; range is widened due to inability to assess the back, confirm crease presence/absence definitively, or inspect corners under magnification.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (approx 55/45 L-R), top border slightly narrower than bottom (approx 55/45 T-B) — centering is acceptable but not tight. Corners show light to moderate rounding on at least the visible lower-left and upper-left; upper-right and lower-right are softer in resolution but appear similarly worn. Surface gloss appears present but with some dulling — no obvious creases are visible from this scan, which is a positive sign. Edges appear reasonably clean with no egregious fraying, consistent with a typical well-kept example of this 1966 issue. The COMC watermark and scan softness prevent confident assessment of print snow, minor scratches, or precise corner condition, warranting a widened range.