1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #25 The Princess of Plunder's Prey — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 2 | $14.99 | $19.99 |
| Auto / Authentic | 1 | $599.99 | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $14.99 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Batman Riddler Back #25 ROBIN & CATWOMAN Lee Merriweather Topps Gum card on eBay |
![]() | $19.99 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 TOPPS BATMAN #25 ROBIN CATWOMAN THE PRINCESS OF PLUNDER’S PREY EX on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (approximately 70/30 L-R), top and bottom borders look relatively balanced near 55/45 T-B — centering is off horizontally and would likely grade as OC-adjacent but not catastrophic. Corners are difficult to assess at this resolution; they appear to have light rounding at two or more corners consistent with a 5 EX range, no sharply fresh corners visible. Surface gloss appears present but subdued — typical for a 55-year-old card; no obvious creases are visible in this scan, though the image resolution prevents ruling out light surface wear or soft creases. Edges appear reasonably clean with no gross chipping visible, though the rough-cut nature normal for 1966 Topps Batman makes edge assessment forgiving; back condition and corner sharpness under magnification remain unknown, widening the range.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L-R), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 55/45 T-B — the left-right tilt is the primary centering concern. Corners show light-to-moderate rounding consistent with handling; no corner is sharp but none appears heavily blunted or badly frayed, suggesting EX territory rather than VG. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious nicks visible at this resolution, consistent with normal 1966 Topps rough-cut texture. Surface shows some gloss loss and possible light toning on the white border areas, but no crease is clearly visible in this photo — the seller's 'EX' self-grade seems plausible; the off-centering is the primary grade-limiter, pushing the floor toward VG-EX (4) and capping realistically around EX-MT (6) without a clearer corner and surface inspection.