1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #26 A Nefarious Note

1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #26 A Nefarious Note — Raw

Buy it now on eBay $34.00 ›cheapest of 1 live listing on eBay

1live listings

0confirmed sales

This card in every grade

What the same card is asking in the other holders this index tracks.

Holder	Listed	Cheapest	Dearest
Raw	1	$34.00	—
TAG ?	3	$2.29	$2.49
PSA 7	—	—	—

Asking range

Not enough history yet. The index needs 2 listings priced at the same time across 3 intervals before it will draw a range - one seller’s asking price is an anecdote, not a market.

Confirmed sales

No confirmed sales recorded yet. The index logs a sale only after a listing verifiably ends — auction results at the final bid. As tracked auctions close, comps appear here automatically.

1 listed · 1 seller30-day window

Live listings

Asking prices and current bids — not values. Est. grade is our opinion from the seller’s photo, on the PSA scale — see notes below.

	Price	Type	Est. grade (ours)	Est. ROI after grading	Listing (opens eBay)
	$34.00	Buy It Now	6 (5–7)	—	1966 NATIONAL PERIODICAL- #26 - BATMAN/ROBIN/RDIDLER- RIDDLER's RIDDLE BACK-NM on eBay

Index grading notes

Estimated grades are this site’s opinion, derived from the seller’s photo and expressed on the PSA scale. Not affiliated with or endorsed by PSA; not a guarantee of any grading outcome.

1966 NATIONAL PERIODICAL- #26 - BATMAN/ROBIN/RDIDLER- RIDDLE

Estimated grade: 6 (5–7) · LOW confidence · asking $34.00

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right border (approx 65/35 L-R); top and bottom borders look closer to 55/45, so horizontal centering is the primary concern. Corners appear to have light-to-moderate wear — no sharp points are clearly visible at this resolution, suggesting at least some rounding, consistent with a 5-6 range. Surface gloss is difficult to assess due to the flat ambient lighting and slight angle, but no obvious creases or staining are detectable. Edge texture looks typical of vintage 1966 Topps rough cuts and should not be penalized. The photo resolution and angle prevent confident assessment of fine corner detail and surface gloss, so the range is widened accordingly; a closer scan of all four corners would be needed to narrow the estimate.