21,260 live listings tracked4,947 card classes311 confirmed salesupdated 0 min ago
1966 Batman

1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #31 Bat on a Buoy

1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #31 Bat on a Buoy
Buy it now — $3.00 ›cheapest of 9 live listings on eBay
9live listings
0confirmed sales
3grades tracked

Every grade of this card

Raw and graded copies tracked side by side. Prices are asking prices and current bids; comps are confirmed sales.
GradeLiveAsking rangeLast confirmed saleEst. grade (ours)
Raw5$3.99 – $25.004.2
TAG ?2$3.00 – $5.004.0
PSA 72$48.95 – $69.99

Index grading notes

Estimated grades are this site’s opinion, derived from the seller’s photo and expressed on the PSA scale. Not affiliated with or endorsed by PSA; not a guarantee of any grading outcome.
1966 Batman Riddler Back Card 31 Bat On A Buoy Stunning NRMI
Estimated grade: 6 (5–7) · MEDIUM confidence · asking $25.00

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears moderately wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) - acceptable for the grade range. The white borders show no obvious toning or staining visible at this resolution. Corners appear reasonably sharp with no obvious rounding visible on the two near corners, though the image angle and small card size make precise corner assessment difficult - the far corners are not clearly resolved. Surface gloss appears present with no obvious creases or major print defects visible, consistent with the seller's NM-MT claim, but the photo resolution and angle prevent confirmation of subtle corner wear or surface issues that would separate a 6 from a 7. Rough cut edges appear normal for the 1966 Topps Batman series and are not penalized.

1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back Bat on a Buoy #31 06mi
Estimated grade: 5 (4–7) · LOW confidence · asking $11.18

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears noticeably wider than bottom (~65/35 T/B), suggesting mild off-centering but no severe miscut. The COM watermark obscures the card center making surface assessment difficult. Corners appear to show light wear - no sharp points visible at this resolution, suggesting minor rounding consistent with EX to VG-EX range. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious fraying visible, normal for the 1966 Topps rough-cut production. Gloss level and surface condition (scratches, creases) cannot be reliably assessed due to the watermark obstruction and image resolution; range is widened accordingly to reflect this uncertainty.

1966 Batman Robin Riddler Back #31 BAT ON A BUOY - England
Estimated grade: 4 (3–5) · MEDIUM confidence · asking $7.49

Centering estimate: left border appears notably wider than right border, approximating roughly 70/30 L-R; top and bottom borders look closer to 55/45 T-B - centering is off but not catastrophically so for this series. Corners: all four corners show visible wear and rounding, particularly the lower-left and upper-right which appear more blunted; no corners are sharp. Surface: some gloss loss is evident across the image area and borders; toning on the white/cream borders is present as expected for the vintage. No creases are clearly visible from this photo but the card angle and image resolution make it difficult to rule out light surface creases definitively, which is why the range extends down to 3. Edges appear intact without obvious chips or tears. The card's condition is consistent with a VG-EX (4) grade, though a VG (3) is possible if a crease is present on reverse or front under closer inspection.

1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #31 Bat on a Buoy Vintage
Estimated grade: 4 (3–5) · LOW confidence · asking $5.00

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right border (roughly 65-70% left-heavy), top and bottom borders appear closer to 55/45 top-heavy — L/R ratio approximately 65/35 or worse, which alone pressures the grade toward EX or below. The card shows the characteristic black border frame of the Riddler-back series with red corner accents intact. Corners appear rounded under the soft focus, suggesting moderate wear consistent with VG-EX to EX range. Surface gloss appears partially present but some dulling is visible; no obvious creases can be confirmed from this photo but the image blur prevents ruling them out. The photo's softness and slight angle distortion significantly limit confidence — back is unseen, and corner/edge detail cannot be assessed with precision, so the range is intentionally wide.