1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #37 Showdown on the Sea — Raw

Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $2.13 | Buy It Now | pending | — | 1966 Topps Canada Batman Riddler Back Showdown On The Sea #37 See Scan |
![]() | $2.15 | Buy It Now | pending | — | 1966 Topps Canada Batman Riddler Back Showdown On The Sea #37 See Scan |
![]() | $4.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Card (R710-16f) #37, VERY NICE CARD!!! NO CREASES !! |
![]() | $4.99 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 Topps Batman/Riddler Back - #37 - Showdown On The Sea/Robin (152) |
![]() | $6.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back Showdown on the Sea #37 1f7d |
![]() | $10.95 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | BATMAN - RIDDLER BACK - card #37 Topps 1966 U.S.A. SHOWDOWN ON THE SEA |
![]() | $12.00 | Buy It Now | 7 (6–8) | — | 1966 Batman Riddler Back Card 37 Showdown On The Sea Stunning NRMINT High Grade |
![]() | $13.48 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back Showdown on the Sea #37 06mi |
![]() | $19.99 | Buy It Now | 2 (1–3) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Backs #37 Showdown on the Sea Netherlands Holland RARE |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L/R), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 55/45 T/B — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show visible wear and rounding on at least two corners (top-left and bottom-left most visible), suggesting meaningful use; corners are not sharp enough for EX-MT or better. The card edges show some roughness consistent with vintage 1966 Topps cuts, which is normal for the set and not penalized heavily. Surface gloss appears reduced with some light soiling or toning visible on the white border areas, and the top-left corner shows what appears to be a small crease or handling mark — though the seller claims no creases, the photo resolution and angle make it impossible to confirm. The photo is taken at a slight angle with modest perspective distortion, limiting precise assessment of surface and corner condition; the range is widened accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right (roughly 70/30 L/R), top border slightly tighter than bottom (roughly 60/40 T/B) — centering is off but not catastrophically so. More critically, the card shows visible corner wear on at least two corners (upper-left and lower-left appear softened/rounded), and there is a clearly visible diagonal crease running through the upper-left quadrant of the card, which is the dominant grade-limiter here. The photo is soft enough that surface gloss is hard to fully assess, but gloss loss consistent with handling wear appears present. The crease alone pushes this into VG (3) territory at best; if the crease is deeper than it appears or additional creases are present on the reverse, a grade of 2 (GOOD) is realistic — hence the 2–4 range.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~60-65% left bias), top and bottom borders look roughly even, suggesting approximate L/R ratio of 65/35 or worse - a meaningful centering issue. Corners appear to show light-to-moderate rounding on at least the visible corners, consistent with VG-EX to EX range. The CoMC watermark obscures the center of the card surface making it impossible to assess print defects, scratches, or creases in that zone. Edges appear reasonably intact with no obvious tears visible, and gloss retention is difficult to judge from this scan; the wide range reflects genuine uncertainty imposed by the watermark obstruction and the compressed scan resolution typical of CoMC stock photos.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (roughly 70/30 L/R), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 55/45 T/B — centering is a meaningful concern on the horizontal axis. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (lower-left and upper-left appear softer), consistent with VG-EX to EX range. Surface gloss appears moderate with some dulling visible, and there is light edge wear but no obvious heavy creasing detected from this view. The back is not visible, and the single slightly angled photo prevents precise corner and edge assessment, so the range is widened accordingly; a crisp crease or more severe corner rounding on the back could push this toward a 3.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (approx 60/40 L/R), top border slightly narrower than bottom (approx 60/40 T/B) - within NM-MT range on both axes. Corners appear reasonably sharp from this distance with no obvious rounding or blunting visible, though the photo angle and card size make precise corner assessment difficult - at least two corners look clean and near-crisp. Surface gloss appears present with no obvious creases, staining, or print defects noted; some minor print texture typical of the vintage Topps 1966 Batman series is expected and not penalized. Edges appear clean with no visible chips or tears; the black border on this Riddler Back series helps mask edge wear but also makes subtle chipping harder to detect from a single seller photo - range is widened accordingly to account for unseen back condition and corner micro-wear.

Centering estimate: left border appears moderately wider than right (roughly 60/40 L/R), top border appears slightly wider than bottom (roughly 55/45 T/B) - centering is imperfect but not severely so, no miscut evident. Corners cannot be assessed with precision due to image resolution and CoMC watermark obscuring the central portion; the card appears to have some corner rounding at visible tips suggesting at minimum light wear. The black border frame of the trading card presentation makes edge assessment difficult. Surface shows no obvious creases visible at this resolution but gloss level is indeterminate. The seller title offers no self-disclosed flaws. Wide range reflects the CoMC stock photo nature of this image which limits detailed corner and surface inspection - a raw card assessment from a single stock-quality photo warrants significant uncertainty.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~65/35 L/R), top border wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — off but not catastrophically so. However, the dominant grade-killers here are the corners: all four corners show visible rounding and wear, with the top-left corner exhibiting significant paper degradation/peeling that appears to include surface or paper loss. The top edge shows heavy chipping and wear consistent with a well-handled card, and there is visible gloss loss across the surface. The card is mounted in photo-corner holders which obscure the corners slightly, preventing a definitive assessment of the worst damage, but what is visible — particularly the top-left — suggests heavy wear. Surface shows fading/color shift typical of aged 1966 Topps but more pronounced than average survivors. A PSA grade of 2 (GOOD) seems most likely given multiple rounded corners, edge wear, and apparent paper loss at top-left; a 3 is possible if the corner damage is less severe than it appears under the mounting.
Same card, other grades
PSA 6 (1)
