1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #37 Showdown on the Sea — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 10 | $2.13 | $19.99 |
| TAG ? | 3 | $2.04 | $3.14 |
| PSA 5.5 | 1 | $67.89 | — |
| PSA 6 | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
| Date | Price | Basis | Listing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-06 | $1.99 | HIGH · final bid | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back Showdown on the Sea #37 |
Live listings
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L/R), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 55/45 T/B — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show visible wear and rounding on at least two corners (top-left and bottom-left most visible), suggesting meaningful use; corners are not sharp enough for EX-MT or better. The card edges show some roughness consistent with vintage 1966 Topps cuts, which is normal for the set and not penalized heavily. Surface gloss appears reduced with some light soiling or toning visible on the white border areas, and the top-left corner shows what appears to be a small crease or handling mark — though the seller claims no creases, the photo resolution and angle make it impossible to confirm. The photo is taken at a slight angle with modest perspective distortion, limiting precise assessment of surface and corner condition; the range is widened accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right (roughly 70/30 L/R), top border slightly tighter than bottom (roughly 60/40 T/B) — centering is off but not catastrophically so. More critically, the card shows visible corner wear on at least two corners (upper-left and lower-left appear softened/rounded), and there is a clearly visible diagonal crease running through the upper-left quadrant of the card, which is the dominant grade-limiter here. The photo is soft enough that surface gloss is hard to fully assess, but gloss loss consistent with handling wear appears present. The crease alone pushes this into VG (3) territory at best; if the crease is deeper than it appears or additional creases are present on the reverse, a grade of 2 (GOOD) is realistic — hence the 2–4 range.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border noticeably wider than bottom (~65/35 T/B) — not catastrophic but off. The card shows significant surface wear and soiling throughout the image area, with visible dirt/grime particularly in the lower left and center regions. Corners appear rounded at multiple points, most visibly at the lower-left and upper-right, consistent with a VG grade range. The black border shows wear and scuffing, and there is noticeable gloss loss across the surface. No obvious hard crease is detectable from this photo, but the overall surface condition and corner rounding push this firmly into the VG (3) range, with a floor of 2 if closer inspection reveals a crease or additional staining not fully visible here.

Centering estimate: left border appears notably narrower than right (roughly 70/30 L/R), top and bottom borders appear more balanced at approximately 55/45 T/B — centering is a meaningful concern on the horizontal axis. Corners show visible rounding on at least two corners (lower-left and upper-left appear softer), consistent with VG-EX to EX range. Surface gloss appears moderate with some dulling visible, and there is light edge wear but no obvious heavy creasing detected from this view. The back is not visible, and the single slightly angled photo prevents precise corner and edge assessment, so the range is widened accordingly; a crisp crease or more severe corner rounding on the back could push this toward a 3.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (approx 60/40 L/R), top border slightly narrower than bottom (approx 60/40 T/B) - within NM-MT range on both axes. Corners appear reasonably sharp from this distance with no obvious rounding or blunting visible, though the photo angle and card size make precise corner assessment difficult - at least two corners look clean and near-crisp. Surface gloss appears present with no obvious creases, staining, or print defects noted; some minor print texture typical of the vintage Topps 1966 Batman series is expected and not penalized. Edges appear clean with no visible chips or tears; the black border on this Riddler Back series helps mask edge wear but also makes subtle chipping harder to detect from a single seller photo - range is widened accordingly to account for unseen back condition and corner micro-wear.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (approx 55/45 L/R), top border appears moderately wider than bottom (approx 60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable but not sharp. The COMc watermark obscures the center surface, making it impossible to assess print defects, staining or surface wear in that zone. Corner tips are not cleanly visible at this resolution but appear to show some rounding or softening, consistent with a VG-EX to EX range. Edges appear reasonably clean with no obvious major nicks visible, and the border color appears intact without heavy toning, though the image quality limits confidence. Gloss level cannot be reliably assessed. Given the visible softness at corners and photo limitations, a grade of 5 EX is the most likely outcome, with the range spanning 4-6 depending on what close inspection of corners and surface reveals.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears noticeably narrower than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is serviceable but not tight. The COMc watermark obscures the surface center, preventing assessment of print defects or surface wear in that zone. Corners appear to show mild rounding at all four points — no sharp razor corners visible, consistent with EX to VG-EX range. Black borders show no obvious chipping or major edge wear visible at this resolution, but the image is not close enough to rule out moderate wear. Gloss level cannot be confidently assessed due to the watermark and image resolution; range widened accordingly to reflect hidden information.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (~65/35 L/R), top border wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — off but not catastrophically so. However, the dominant grade-killers here are the corners: all four corners show visible rounding and wear, with the top-left corner exhibiting significant paper degradation/peeling that appears to include surface or paper loss. The top edge shows heavy chipping and wear consistent with a well-handled card, and there is visible gloss loss across the surface. The card is mounted in photo-corner holders which obscure the corners slightly, preventing a definitive assessment of the worst damage, but what is visible — particularly the top-left — suggests heavy wear. Surface shows fading/color shift typical of aged 1966 Topps but more pronounced than average survivors. A PSA grade of 2 (GOOD) seems most likely given multiple rounded corners, edge wear, and apparent paper loss at top-left; a 3 is possible if the corner damage is less severe than it appears under the mounting.

