1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #4 Rarin' to Go — Raw

Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $4.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Card (R710-16f) #4, VERY NICE CARD!!! NO CREASES !! |
![]() | $5.03 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #4 Rarin to Go |
![]() | $14.63 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–7) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back Rarin' to Go #4 06mi |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 left-right), top and bottom borders appear more even at approximately 60/40 top-heavy — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show visible wear and rounding, particularly on the bottom corners which appear soft and slightly frayed; upper corners look marginally better but not sharp. The card shows significant edge wear along the top edge with darkening/soiling consistent with handling, and the black border areas show typical wear for a raw 1966 Topps Batman. Surface appears to have some gloss loss and possible light handling marks, though no creases are clearly visible confirming the seller's claim. The photo angle and moderate resolution limit precise corner and surface assessment, warranting a widened range.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L/R), top border tighter than bottom (approximately 60/40 T/B) — centering is off but not catastrophically miscut. The card shows visible corner wear on at least two corners visible in the photo, with rounding evident particularly at the lower corners. The black border along the left and bottom edges shows significant wear/chipping. Surface appears to have some gloss loss and there is a visible horizontal crease or stress line across the mid-card area consistent with handling wear. The photo angle limits assessment of all four corners and the back, so the range is widened; if the crease is pronounced (which it appears to be), a grade of 2-3 is most likely, with 4 possible only if the surface disturbance is less severe than it appears.

Centering estimate: left/right borders appear approximately 60/40 favoring left, top/bottom roughly 55/45 — acceptable for the grade range. The COMC watermark obscures the lower center surface making crease and gloss assessment difficult. Corners appear to have moderate rounding visible at the top-left and bottom-right, consistent with a grade in the EX to VG-EX range. Edges look reasonably clean without obvious fraying but the image resolution limits confidence. No obvious creases are visible in accessible areas of the image, but the watermark obstruction prevents a definitive surface call — range is widened accordingly.