1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #4 Rarin' to Go — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 4 | $4.00 | $14.63 |
| TAG ? | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $4.00 | Buy It Now | 4 (3–5) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Card (R710-16f) #4, VERY NICE CARD!!! NO CREASES !! on eBay |
![]() | $5.03 | Buy It Now | 3 (2–4) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #4 Rarin to Go on eBay |
![]() | $7.00 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #4 Rarin' to Go on eBay |
![]() | $14.63 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back Rarin' to Go #4 06mi on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 left-right), top and bottom borders appear more even at approximately 60/40 top-heavy — centering is off but not catastrophically so. Corners show visible wear and rounding, particularly on the bottom corners which appear soft and slightly frayed; upper corners look marginally better but not sharp. The card shows significant edge wear along the top edge with darkening/soiling consistent with handling, and the black border areas show typical wear for a raw 1966 Topps Batman. Surface appears to have some gloss loss and possible light handling marks, though no creases are clearly visible confirming the seller's claim. The photo angle and moderate resolution limit precise corner and surface assessment, warranting a widened range.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably wider than right (roughly 70/30 L/R), top border tighter than bottom (approximately 60/40 T/B) — centering is off but not catastrophically miscut. The card shows visible corner wear on at least two corners visible in the photo, with rounding evident particularly at the lower corners. The black border along the left and bottom edges shows significant wear/chipping. Surface appears to have some gloss loss and there is a visible horizontal crease or stress line across the mid-card area consistent with handling wear. The photo angle limits assessment of all four corners and the back, so the range is widened; if the crease is pronounced (which it appears to be), a grade of 2-3 is most likely, with 4 possible only if the surface disturbance is less severe than it appears.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly wider than right (~55/45 L/R); top border appears moderately wider than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering appears acceptable for EX range. Corners cannot be assessed with precision at this resolution; no obvious severe rounding is visible but the image distance prevents corner grading confidence. Surface shows expected vintage color fading/toning but no visible creases or staining from this view. The decorated die-cut style border frame appears intact with no obvious tears or paper loss; however the photo is too distant and lacks corner close-ups to confidently distinguish EX (5) from VG-EX (4) or EX-MT (6), so the range is widened accordingly.

Centering estimate: left border appears noticeably narrower than right (approximately 70/30 left-right), top border appears slightly tighter than bottom (roughly 60/40 top-bottom), suggesting off-center but not severely miscut. The COMC watermark obscures the lower-center surface and prevents full surface assessment. Corners are difficult to evaluate at this resolution and angle — no obvious severe rounding is visible but the image is too distant for confident corner grading. Surface gloss appears intact with no obvious creases visible, which would support at least EX (5) territory, but the off-center left-right axis and inability to inspect corners or edges closely prevents a higher ceiling. The range of 4–6 reflects genuine uncertainty from photo limitations; a closer scan could shift this meaningfully in either direction.