1966 Topps Batman Riddler Back #9 Batmobile Breakdown — Raw

This card in every grade
| Holder | Listed | Cheapest | Dearest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 4 | $11.18 | $21.53 |
| TAG ? | — | — | — |
| PSA 7 | — | — | — |
Asking range
Confirmed sales
Live listings
| Price | Type | Est. grade (ours) | Est. ROI after grading | Listing (opens eBay) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | $11.18 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 Riddler Back Batman Robin Adam West Burt Ward Batmobile Breakdown #9 16ez on eBay |
![]() | $18.08 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–7) | — | 1966 Riddler Back Batman Robin Adam West Burt Ward Batmobile Breakdown #9 10ti on eBay |
![]() | $19.99 | Buy It Now | 5 (4–6) | — | 1966 TOPPS BATMAN #9 BATMOBILE BREAKDOWN EX on eBay |
![]() | $21.53 | Buy It Now | 1 (1–2) | — | 1966 Riddler Back Batman Adam West Robin Burt Ward Batmobile Breakdown #9 0au4 on eBay |
Index grading notes

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border noticeably thinner than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is imperfect but not severely off-center. Corners appear to show light-to-moderate rounding, particularly visible on the upper corners, suggesting EX to VG-EX range. The card surface shows some gloss loss consistent with age and handling, and there is visible toning/aging on the white borders. No creases are definitively visible from this scan, but the image resolution and reproduction quality limit confidence significantly — corner wear and surface issues cannot be assessed with precision. The rough-cut edges typical of 1966 Topps Batman are present and are not penalized. Range widened due to inability to confirm back condition, precise corner sharpness, or hidden surface flaws from this single low-resolution photo.

Centering estimate: left border appears slightly narrower than right (~55/45 L/R), top border appears narrower than bottom (~60/40 T/B) — centering is acceptable but not tight. The decorative holder frame and overall image softness obscure fine corner and edge detail, making precise assessment difficult. Surface gloss appears present with no obvious heavy creasing visible, but the photo resolution is insufficient to confirm corner sharpness — corners appear slightly soft but no pronounced rounding is discernible. The image is too soft to rule out light print defects, minor surface wear, or edge fraying; the wide range of 4–7 reflects genuine uncertainty driven by the holder and image quality limiting close inspection of corners and edges.

Centering estimate: left border appears narrower than right (~60/40 left-right disadvantage), top and bottom borders look roughly even (~50/50), so horizontal centering is the primary concern at approximately 60/40 or slightly worse. Corners: the perspective angle makes precise corner assessment difficult, but the lower-left and lower-right corners show visible rounding consistent with EX to VG-EX range; upper corners appear slightly better but still show light wear. Surface: gloss appears moderately retained with no obvious creases visible from this angle, which aligns with the seller's 'EX' claim — though a crease could be hiding on the reverse or in shadow. Edges look intact with no major fraying, consistent with normal 1966 Topps rough-cut characteristics; the grade range of 4–6 reflects honest uncertainty about corner sharpness and whether any hidden creases exist on the surface or back.

This card shows extensive damage visible across the entire surface. Centering: left/right borders appear roughly 50/50, top/bottom roughly 55/45 — centering itself is not the issue. However, the card exhibits heavy, deep creasing running diagonally and across multiple areas of the front, severe paper stress/wrinkling throughout, significant corner rounding on all four corners (all corners are fully blunted), heavy gloss loss across the surface, and what appears to be paper loss or lifting along the black border edges. The damage profile — multiple heavy creases, severe corner wear, and surface deterioration — places this firmly in PSA 1 (Poor-Fair) territory, with a possible PSA 2 (Good) ceiling only if the creases are shallower than they appear. This is a low-grade raw copy with significant eye appeal issues; collectors would primarily value it as a space-filler.